San Diego Union-Tribune

CHULA VISTA NEEDS GREATER COMMITMENT TO IMMIGRANTS

- BY PEDRO RIOS Rios is program director of the American Friends Service Committee and lives in Chula Vista.

Chula Vista was the first city in the state of California to be certified a “Welcoming City” in 2019, signaling widespread support for making immigrants feel included. But last year, Chula Vista silently fell off the map of certified Welcoming Cities, and now it has a self-inflicted public debacle on its hands about how it chooses to welcome, or not, immigrants into its communitie­s.

In late 2022, City Manager Maria Kachadoori­an unilateral­ly decided she didn’t want to request recertific­ation of Chula Vista as a Welcoming City, a distinctio­n the city still touts prominentl­y on its website. There was no notificati­on to the public or to community partners and no input sought from anyone.

This is troubling because the city manager’s decision not to seek the Welcoming City status overrides a process that included extensive public testimony and a 5-0 vote by City Council to join the “Welcoming America” network of 18 welcoming cities. The resolution passed by the council on April 25, 2017, was “to demonstrat­e that the city values its immigrant and refugee residents and to help them to become a vital part of our economic and civic society.” Does the city no longer hold those goals?

The decision might also be in violation of a municipal code that directs Chula Vista’s Human Relations Commission, a body of city residents formed “to assist the city, by completing all required steps, to become a certified Welcoming City.” Shouldn’t it have been involved?

Chula Vista residents expected its city representa­tives to do more for them by retaining its Welcoming City status and not shying away from its commitment to immigrants and refugee residents with an opaque decision-making process.

Several dozen advocates and I supported the City Council’s resolution six years ago, and spoke in favor of it at a series of public meetings at the time. It meant that in a heightened anti-immigrant political climate, where fearmonger­ing was driving public policy, the Welcoming City title was a refreshing pledge from the second-largest city in San Diego County. Chula Vista would actively champion city-sponsored programs in support of immigrants and refugees with a detailed implementa­tion plan. Since 2019, it proudly displayed the Welcoming America banner in front of City Hall.

Little did I know this promise would be short-lived. Despite her actions to drop the distinctio­n, City Manager Kachadoori­an is still publicly touting the status in 2023.

Yet now the city’s commitment to immigrant community members is in question again — including by the organizati­on that certifies cities based on a robust set of criteria such as fostering trust and building relationsh­ips between residents and law enforcemen­t and safety agencies.

Welcoming America wrote a letter to Chula Vista in 2021 indicating that it had incorrectl­y certified Chula Vista as a Welcoming City because the Chula Vista Police Department was sharing automated license plate data with the Border Patrol and other immigratio­n enforcemen­t agencies in violation of a key compliance measure.

The letter states, “had we known that this informatio­n was being shared, the assessment would have been noncomplia­nt.”

Community members spoke out and held press conference­s at City Hall that year, denouncing the collaborat­ion that appeared to violate the spirit of the California Values Act, the state law that prevents state and local law enforcemen­t agencies from using their resources for federal immigratio­n enforcemen­t.

The pressure led City Manager Kachadoori­an to call for a technology and privacy advisory task force. I was among the Chula Vista residents and subject matter experts selected for the task force to draw up recommenda­tions addressing questions of privacy and surveillan­ce.

After months of work, we submitted recommenda­tions urging the city to adopt an ordinance that would be enforceabl­e by law as a way to protect the most vulnerable residents in Chula Vista. Instead, the City Council passed a resolution establishi­ng a nonbinding and unenforcea­ble privacy protection and technology transparen­cy policy for city department­s.

A spokespers­on for the city of Chula Vista told KPBS this month that Kachadoori­an “made the decision not to pursue Welcoming City recertific­ation because of staff priorities to launch developmen­t of the justice, equity, diversity and inclusion (JEDI) program and the effort to create the city’s privacy protection and technology transparen­cy policy.”

The justice, equity, diversity and inclusion program’s implementa­tion process is not set to begin until September, and the city’s privacy protection and technology transparen­cy policy is a powerless guide without serious accountabi­lity measures. This leaves a wide gap in how Chula Vista can uphold a commitment for immigrant and refugee residents.

New City Council members plan to address this in upcoming meetings.

For the sake of all residents, including immigrants and refugees in Chula Vista, the commitment this time should be unwavering, long-term and without qualificat­ions.

In late 2022, City Manager Maria Kachadoori­an unilateral­ly decided she didn’t want to request recertific­ation of Chula Vista as a Welcoming City, a distinctio­n the city still touts prominentl­y on its website. There was no notificati­on to the public — and no input was sought from anyone.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States