San Diego Union-Tribune

BANK FAILED IN SPITE OF LONG-TERM FED SCRUTINY

Risky practices at SVB monitored for more than a year

- BY JEANNA SMIALEK Smialek writes for The Associated Press.

Silicon Valley Bank’s risky practices were on the Federal Reserve’s radar for more than a year — an awareness that proved insufficie­nt to stop the bank’s demise.

The Fed repeatedly warned the bank that it had problems, according to a person familiar with the matter.

In 2021, a Fed review of the growing bank found serious weaknesses in how it was handling key risks. Supervisor­s at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, which oversaw Silicon Valley Bank, issued six citations. Those warnings, known as “matters requiring attention” and “matters requiring immediate attention,” flagged that the firm was doing a bad job of ensuring that it would have enough easyto-tap cash on hand in the event of trouble.

But the bank did not fix its vulnerabil­ities. By July 2022, Silicon Valley Bank was in a full supervisor­y review — getting a more careful look — and was ultimately rated deficient for governance and controls. It was placed under a set of restrictio­ns that prevented it from growing through acquisitio­ns. Last autumn, staff members from the San Francisco Fed met with senior leaders at the firm to talk about their ability to gain access to enough cash in a crisis and possible exposure to losses as interest rates rose.

It became clear to the Fed that the firm was using bad models to determine how its business would fare as the central bank raised rates: Its leaders were assuming that higher interest revenue would substantia­lly help their financial situation as rates went up, but that was out of step with reality.

By early 2023, Silicon Valley Bank was in what the Fed calls a “horizontal review,” an assessment meant to gauge the strength of risk management. That checkup identified additional deficienci­es — but at that point, the bank’s days were numbered. In early March, it faced a run and failed, sending shock-waves across the broader U.S. banking system that ultimately led to a sweeping government interventi­on meant to prevent panic from spreading. On Sunday, Credit Suisse, which was caught up in the panic that followed Silicon Valley Bank’s demise, was taken over by UBS in a hastily arranged deal put together by the Swiss government.

Major questions have been raised about why regulators failed to spot problems and take action early enough to prevent Silicon Valley Bank’s March 10 downfall. Many of the issues that contribute­d to its collapse seem obvious in hindsight: Measuring by value, about 97 percent of its deposits were uninsured by the federal government, which made customers more likely to run at the first sign of trouble. Many of the bank’s depositors were in the technology sector, which has recently hit tough times as higher interest rates have weighed on business.

And Silicon Valley Bank also held a lot of long-term debt that had declined in market value as the Fed raised interest rates to fight inflation. As a result, it faced huge losses when it had to sell those securities to raise cash to meet a wave of withdrawal­s from customers.

The Fed has initiated an investigat­ion into what went wrong with the bank’s oversight, headed by Michael S. Barr, the Fed’s vice chair for supervisio­n. The inquiry’s results are expected to be publicly released by May 1. Lawmakers are also digging into what went awry.

The picture that is emerging is one of a bank whose leaders failed to plan for a realistic future and neglected looming financial and operationa­l problems, even as they were raised by Fed supervisor­s. For instance, according to a person familiar with the matter, executives at the firm were told of cybersecur­ity problems both by internal employees and by the Fed — but ignored the concerns.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., which has taken control of the firm, did not comment on its behalf.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, DMass., has asked for an independen­t review of what happened at Silicon Valley Bank and has urged that Jerome Powell, the Fed chair, not be involved in that effort. He “bears direct responsibi­lity for — and has a long record of failure involving” bank regulation, she wrote in a letter Sunday.

 ?? IAN C. BATES NYT ?? The Silicon Valley Bank, headquarte­red in Santa Clara, was using incorrect models to assess its own risks amid rising interest rates, according to the Fed.
IAN C. BATES NYT The Silicon Valley Bank, headquarte­red in Santa Clara, was using incorrect models to assess its own risks amid rising interest rates, according to the Fed.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States