San Diego Union-Tribune

EU OFFICIALS AGREE TO SUPPLY MORE ARTILLERY SHELLS TO UKRAINE

Bloc agrees to rearm nation against spring offensive by Russia

- BY STEVEN ERLANGER Erlanger writes for The New York Times.

European Union foreign and defense ministers agreed on Monday to spend up to 2 billion euros, or $2.14 billion, to supply Ukraine with artillery shells, replenish their own national stocks and ramp up Europe’s ammunition production.

As is typical for the bloc and its 27 members, the details of the agreement must still be worked out and questions remain about the speed of the response — a crucial matter as Ukraine prepares for a counteroff­ensive.

But the agreement neverthele­ss marks another step for the EU in working collective­ly for Ukraine, and in an area — defense — that member countries largely keep as a national priority.

Josep Borrell Fontelles, the bloc’s foreign policy chief, hailed the agreement. “We are taking a key step toward delivering on our promises to provide Ukraine with more artillery ammunition,” he said on Twitter.

On Monday, 17 member states, plus Norway, also agreed to work with a Brussels institutio­n, the European Defense Agency, on joint ammunition procuremen­t, especially for the 155 mm artillery rounds Ukraine needs.

Germany’s defense minister, Boris Pistorius, said that Germany would also let other countries join in its contracts with German defense manufactur­ers since speed was of the essence. “Our goal has to be to ship a significan­t amount of munitions to Ukraine before the end of this year,” he said.

His Estonian counterpar­t, Hanno Pevkur, said, “There are many, many details still to solve, but for me, it is most important that we conclude these negotiatio­ns, and it shows me one thing: If there is a will, there is a way.”

But even one of the most forceful advocates for helping Ukraine, Foreign Minister Gabrielius Landsbergi­s of Lithuania, has admitted that the target of 1 million rounds this year, proposed by Prime Minister Kaja Kallas of Estonia, was aspiration­al. “It is possible that we might not be able to reach it,” he said.

With Ukraine using up artillery shells faster than the West can produce them, the Europeans are pushing ahead with a three-part program.

The first part, which is most urgent, involves pressing member states to send artillery shells from their own dwindling stocks to Ukraine, using 1 billion euros to reimburse them.

It remains unclear how many shells are available in EU stockpiles, since some member states have refused to divulge their holdings, partly for security reasons. And countries have been keen to preserve some of their own stocks in case the war suddenly escalates.

The new European money is meant to increase their willingnes­s to part with those shells.

Ukraine’s primary need is for 155 mm shells to be used in Western guns. Ukraine says it wants 350,000 shells a month but arms manufactur­ers in the European Union can only produce a total of about 650,000 rounds of all types a year.

That is why the second part of the plan involves another 1 billion euros for arms manufactur­ers to accelerate the production of shells, both to replenish EU stocks and provide more for Ukraine. But that won’t be easy or quick: New contracts must be drawn up and signed, the now-rare raw materials to make explosives must be sourced and factories must be built.

Officials in Brussels want to start ordering ammunition collective­ly because they believe that larger orders are more attractive to manufactur­ers and can bring prices down. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and others have cited the example of Brussels buying COVID-19 vaccines in bulk.

Some countries do not want to hand over that kind of power on defense issues to Brussels or believe that coalitions of member states with experience in military contracts would be more efficient than the commission, which has not negotiated such contracts before.

The third part of the plan is longer-term and centers on boosting Europe’s defense industry, but that would require billions more and remains vague.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States