San Diego Union-Tribune

NESTLÉ HEALTH STAR RATING LACKING

A third of sales from company’s foods considered unhealthy

- BY DASHA AFANASIEVA Afanasieva writes for Bloomberg News.

Nestlé said a third of its sales missed an independen­t definition of healthy as it applied a nutritiona­l rating test across its portfolio.

The finding shows that Nestlé has room to improve as it aims to be the top health and wellness food company. Nestlé said Tuesday that according to the Health Star Rating system, 30 percent of the Swiss company’s portfolio is considered healthy and 35 percent unhealthy.

The remainder comes from pet food, infant formula and medical nutrition products, which were not tested as they’re designed to meet specific goals like helping kidney function.

With obesity a global health crisis in much of the developing world and on the rise in emerging market, food companies have been under pressure to make their portfolios healthier and increase transparen­cy. Investors have called on them report in accordance with independen­t government-approved measures of how nutritious their portfolios are, rather than their own internal metrics, even though the industry has not settled on a single scale.

Big food companies like Kraft Heinz or Kellogg have so far resisted calls to report on independen­t nutrition metrics.

Nestlé decided to use the HSR system, widely used in Australia and New Zealand, which rates products on a sale from half a star to five stars. A score of 3.5 stars or above is considered healthy.

ShareActio­n, an investor campaign group which has been pushing Nestlé for more transparen­cy, welcomed the new reporting, though urged the company to improve its ranking.

“As one of the biggest food and drink companies in the world, Nestlé has an outsize inf luence on what people eat and drink,” said

Holly Gabriel, a ShareActio­n campaigner. “What this disclosure worryingly shows is the company is still far too reliant on the sale of less healthy food and drink products.”

The ratings are based on the product’s energy, saturated fat, total sugars, sodium, protein, dietary fiber and fruit, vegetable, nut and legume content. Products like confection­ery or salty sauces score lower on the scale, while low fat, low salt and sugar items including plain coffee and waters score higher.

The increased transparen­cy helps investors understand how exposed companies are to efforts to curb obesity, for example through advertisin­g bans. It also amplifies the pressure on companies to reformulat­e products to make them healthier.

While Nestlé has room to improve, the majority of Nestle’s sales wouldn’t be in the crosshairs of anti-junk food legislatio­n because they are pet food or products like infant formula, or considered relatively healthy.

Rivals Danone and Unilever already report on their portfolios in accordance to the HSR.

Danone said that in 2021 about 90 percent of its products by sales volume got an HSR rating of 3.5 stars or above. Only 17 percent of Unilever’s nutrition and ice cream portfolio reached that standard the same year.

Nestlé has been reformulat­ing products like Nesquik to contain less sugar in some markets, but Chief Executive Officer Mark Schneider told analysts earlier this year that reporting on nutrition does not mean the group would turn away from products like KitKats and Smarties.

“We’re not interested in a target on how the healthier parts of the portfolio would outperform the other parts of the portfolio,” he said. “We want to succeed in both.”

Nestlé said the study covered 97 percent of its revenue, excluding some products that aren’t foods or beverages as well as some recent acquisitio­ns.

 ?? HOLLIE ADAMS BLOOMBERG ?? Although Nestlé could improve its health star rating, the company participat­ed in the program to increase transparen­cy.
HOLLIE ADAMS BLOOMBERG Although Nestlé could improve its health star rating, the company participat­ed in the program to increase transparen­cy.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States