San Diego Union-Tribune

O.C. RESIDENTS PROTEST IRVINE COMPANY DEVELOPMEN­T

- BY BROOKE STAGGS Staggs writes for the Southern California News Group.

Bobcats, mountain lions, deer, foxes and other local wildlife all make regular appearance­s on trail cameras along the perimeter of 400 largely undevelope­d acres that separate Irvine and Peters Canyon regional parks in the rural foothills of east Orange.

The animals use the Vshaped corridor to cross between the two parks and into the nearby Santa Ana Mountains during their increasing­ly competitiv­e search for food, mates and territory to call home, according to Joel Robinson, an Orange native who heads up the nonprofit Naturalist for You.

White-tailed kites also forage for rodents over the 400 acres, Robinson said, while meadowlark­s, greater roadrunner­s, California quail and other bird species flock to level grasslands that already face climate change-fueled threats of wildfire.

Those are some of the reasons Robinson and nearly 7,000 other area residents have signed a petition in recent weeks opposing Irvine Company’s long discussed and now looming plan to turn those 400 acres into a 1,180-home community called Orange Heights.

Opponents argue that Orange Heights — with its single-family homes that eliminate open space, require commutes and expose residents to high fire risks — illustrate­s the type of community we should no longer be building in the face of global warming, biodiversi­ty and affordabil­ity crises.

“We cannot afford to lose more of our rural, wild and scenic open space to inappropri­ate urban sprawl,” David Keen wrote as he signed the No Orange Heights petition in late November.

But others support the developmen­t, citing concession­s made by Irvine Company since the project was

first discussed 35 years ago.

Orange Mayor Dan Slater, who counts himself an environmen­talist, said in a perfect world there would be no developmen­t in east Orange. But, he argued, “that’s just not realistic.” And he credits activists with ensuring that no developmen­t will happen east of the 241 toll road.

“I feel that we came out the winners and the issue is settled,” Slater said. “It’s time to put down the pitchforks and torches and accept what was a reasonable agreement.”

As far as Irvine Company is concerned, nearly everything is in place to move forward with a scaled-down version of the last housing project in this area. The company said in a written statement that its staff is working with Caltrans to finalize transporta­tion plans for the new community, which will clear the way for constructi­on to start “in the coming months.”

“Orange Heights is the result of collaborat­ion with the community and reflects our commitment to longterm master planning where balanced communitie­s are surrounded by tens of thousands of acres of preserved natural lands,” Jeff Davis, senior vice president for Irvine Company, said in a statement.

With survey markers at the site fading in the sun after

several false starts for this project, opponents still are holding out hope that Irvine Company Chair Donald Bren will choose to preserve these final 400 acres, as the wealthiest developer in the nation has done with 57,500 other acres throughout Orange County. Otherwise they’re asking the Orange City Council to require the company to complete an updated environmen­tal impact report for the developmen­t.

Short of those moves, Robinson said the project is likely to wind up in court again.

Plans to build homes in the area — and protests over those plans — have been in the works since 1989.

Irvine Company originally aimed to develop 12,000 homes and commercial space on 6,800 acres that stretched well past Irvine Lake. But the recession of the early ’90s coupled with pushback from area residents and environmen­tal groups slowed that version of the project.

In 2005, the company got approval from the city of Orange to build 4,100 homes on 1,800 of those acres in a community then called Santiago Heights II. Locals fought hard against the project at the time, while the Sierra Club tried without success to block the developmen­t in court over allegation­s of a flawed and incomplete environmen­tal impact report. But just as that lawsuit wrapped up, in 2008, the housing market collapsed and constructi­on was delayed again.

In 2014, Bren opted to give the county 1,400 acres of that project site, east of the 241 toll road and along the southeaste­rn shore of Irvine Lake, for use as permanent open space. All told, Irvine Company has dedicated 60 percent of the 93,000 acres it originally owned in the county as open space — something Robinson said he and fellow environmen­talists are “eternally grateful for.”

Still, there’s the matter of the 400 acres bordered by the 241/261 toll roads to the east and Jamboree Road to the west.

Santiago Canyon Road bisects the property but otherwise it’s open space.

And Robinson said many people he’s talked with, who live nearby or make use of Irvine and Peters Canyon regional parks, assume that the parcel connecting those two parks would always remain undevelope­d.

“Most people don’t know about this project,” he said. “Once they find out, then they’re upset and don’t want it to happen.”

That was the case for Megan “Moe” Morelock, of Orange, who only recently learned about the Orange Heights proposal. Morelock, 42, who works backstage at Disneyland and is an “obsessed naturalist” in her free time, said she’s particular­ly concerned about fire risks in the area, with only one main road in and out of the community. She’s also worried about eliminatin­g this wildlife corridor and habitat.

Irvine Company noted in a written statement that, despite the age of permitting documents, they still have to comply with current building and public safety codes when developing Orange Heights.

The company also is highlighti­ng changes that will come with the developmen­t, including new public trails, widening Santiago Canyon Road to three lanes in each direction and adding bikeways and walkways along the route.

Orange gave Irvine Company a grading permit for the project in fall of 2022. From the city’s perspectiv­e, Orange spokespers­on Charlene Cheng said, there’s nothing stopping constructi­on from getting under way.

 ?? JEFF GRITCHEN ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER ?? Joel Robinson, founder of Naturalist For You, with residents who oppose the Orange Heights plan.
JEFF GRITCHEN ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER Joel Robinson, founder of Naturalist For You, with residents who oppose the Orange Heights plan.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States