San Francisco Chronicle - (Sunday)

Cleanwater fund dries up in state’s virusera budget

A truck sprays a field in Cantua Creek (Fresno County), where the pandemic is jeopardizi­ng a fund to improve drinking water.

- By Alexei Koseff

CANTUA CREEK, Fresno County — The water is too contaminat­ed to safely drink, but residents of this farmworker community in the Central Valley pay $74 a month just to be able to turn on the tap at home.

Their bills are even higher if they use more than 50 gallons a day, a fraction of daily water consumptio­n for the average California household. And when Fresno County completes a new well that has been planned for years, the price will increase again to cover the cost of treating manganesel­aced water pumped from hundreds of feet below.

It’s a lot of money for fami

lies living on the minimum wage they earn in the nearby fields, so local leaders hoped to get help from a state fund created last year to address a crisis that has left the 275 residents of Cantua Creek and a million other California­ns without clean water. Then the coronaviru­s pandemic hit, throwing the finances of the program into question right as it started.

The situation underscore­s just how difficult it will be for the state to reach its goal of bringing safe and affordable drinking water to all. At a meeting this month where the State Water Resources Control Board adopted its first spending plan for what was supposed to be a $130 millionaye­ar investment for the next decade, Chairman Joaquin Esquivel acknowledg­ed that the economic downturn could set California back.

“The number of systems we can assume will be out of compliance, we’re really concerned that that’s even more, exponentia­lly growing,” Esquivel said. “And the resources aren’t necessaril­y there, growing with it.”

For the residents of Cantua Creek who have fought the hardest to fix their polluted water, it can feel as though they are the butt of a cruel bureaucrat­ic joke — a community of workers growing the fruits and vegetables to feed a state that can’t supply them with clean water.

“It’s humiliatin­g what they do to us,” Julia Mendoza, 50, who has traveled to Sacramento numerous times to lobby legislator­s and regulators for the new fund, said in Spanish. “We’re asking for the same right that everybody has: clean water.” Surrounded by almond and pistachio groves 40 miles southwest of Fresno, Cantua Creek has a school, a small post office and a communal electric car. The water, supplied by the county and purchased from Westlands, the largest agricultur­al water district in the state, comes from the same irrigation canals that flow to fields of row crops.

It’s one of 310 public water systems in California that, as of March, were out of compliance with state standards on contaminat­ion levels or treatment techniques. The systems serve more than 920,000 people, though advocates say the number without safe drinking water is even higher when those who rely on private wells or small, unregulate­d systems are included.

The pollution is largely concentrat­ed in agricultur­al communitie­s in the Central Valley and Salinas Valley, where water is often contaminat­ed by nitrates from pesticides, fertilizer runoff and dairy waste, and arsenic, which scientists believe is released into aquifers by overpumpin­g. Cancercaus­ing chemicals have been found in the groundwate­r in some places.

“When you turn on the faucet in the morning, it has a very strong smell — like it’s rotten,” Blanca Gomez, 54, who has lived in Cantua Creek for more than two decades, said in Spanish.

Her family’s water bill approaches $90 a month just from bathing, cleaning and washing clothes. Gomez said that after doing a load of laundry, she uses the water from her washing machine for plants.

“All of the help goes to the rich, and they never take us poor people into account,” she said.

Five years ago, as the drought sent prices for surface water soaring, Cantua Creek voted down a $30 monthly rate increase and nearly had its water shut off by Fresno County. That caught the attention of the state, which stepped in with emergency assistance and has since been

providing every home with eight 5gallon jugs of water twice a month.

The supply gives people something to drink and cook with, though Gomez said it’s not enough for some large families. And residents still have to use the contaminat­ed water flowing through their pipes for everything else, which they worry may be causing health problems.

“Our hair is falling out. Look at my hair. Most people living here, it’s falling out. Look, look,” Mendoza said, grabbing her head and pulling loose several graying strands. “This is not a solution. We want a solution to our water.”

The state’s Safe and Affordable Drinking Water Fund, created last year to help communitie­s without the resources to build new water systems or maintain old ones, was meant to be that solution. But with the pandemic dragging California’s economy into recession, it’s unclear how much the state will be able to help.

After a multiyear push to tax residentia­l water users and fertilizer sales fell short in the Legislatur­e, Gov. Gavin Newsom turned to an unconventi­onal source to create the fund: the state’s capandtrad­e auction for large greenhouse gas polluters, which is supposed to pay for programs that reduce emissions. Under a law signed a year ago, the fund would receive 5% of annual capandtrad­e revenue, up to $130 million, for the next 10 years.

To fully fund the program, the quarterly auctions would need to raise an average of $650 million — a total regularly exceeded before the pandemic hit. The first three auctions of the last fiscal year brought in an average of about $694 million.

Then in May, California made just $24.5 million from its first postpandem­ic auction, down 97% from the same period in 2019. While that was not an immediate threat to clean drinking water projects, which received full funding last year, it raised alarms for advocates who worry about the sustainabi­lity of a program that could fluctuate wildly. The next few auctions, likely to be held during pandemic times, could bring equally grim results.

“We’ve been pretty clear that in the long term, we don’t think that the capandtrad­e revenue is the right solution,” said Michael Claiborne, a senior attorney with Leadership Counsel for Justice and Accountabi­lity, one of the organizati­ons that lobbied for the fund.

There is not likely to be an alternativ­e anytime soon. The law includes a backstop from the state general fund, beginning in 2023, but California has nothing to spare this year after pulling nearly every string it could to close a projected $54 billion budget deficit. Returning to the original idea of a dedicated cleanwater fee on customers and agribusine­ss seems like an even longer shot.

“Even if the Legislatur­e had a stomach to pass a tax right now, which I don’t think they do, the money from farmers wouldn’t be there,” said Emily Rooney, president of the Agricultur­al Council of California, which represents about 15,000 growers.

Rooney said supporters on all sides are banding together to seek federal dollars and other resources: “I do believe there are pots of money available to solve the crisis.”

The Legislatur­e has to approve a spending plan for 202021 capandtrad­e revenue when it returns Monday for the final month of its session.

Leaders have indicated that the clean drinking water program will be a priority for whatever funding is ultimately available, though advocates expect it will wind up short of the full $130 million.

State Sen. Bill Monning, DCarmel, who carried legislatio­n to create the fund, said the budget problems amount to a blip in what was always going to be a longterm effort to fix California’s water contaminat­ion crisis.

“If there’s a stall, it will be that,” he said. “It won’t be a cessation.”

But it does leave communitie­s that have been waiting for clean water hanging in the balance a while longer.

This spring, after years of studies and site tests and stops and starts, Fresno County dug a new well in Cantua

Creek. Located across the street from Gomez’s brightblue home and the electric vehicle charging station, it won’t yield water until the county builds pumps and a manganese treatment plant.

Faced with uncertaint­y about whether the state will have money available to help pay for the project, Mendoza recalls the saying “El que persevera alcanza.” The rough translatio­n is “Where there’s a will, there’s a way.”

“It’s been a fight,” she said. “We have to have that hope.”

 ?? LiPo Ching / Special to The Chronicle ??
LiPo Ching / Special to The Chronicle
 ?? LiPo Ching / Special to The Chronicle ?? Blanca Gomez fills a container with water for her dogs. After doing laundry, she uses water from her washing machine for plants. “All of the help goes to the rich,” she says.
LiPo Ching / Special to The Chronicle Blanca Gomez fills a container with water for her dogs. After doing laundry, she uses water from her washing machine for plants. “All of the help goes to the rich,” she says.
 ?? LiPo Ching / Special to The Chronicle ?? Twice a month, the state delivers eight 5gallon jugs of water, a supply to drink and cook with, to homes in Cantua Creek.
LiPo Ching / Special to The Chronicle Twice a month, the state delivers eight 5gallon jugs of water, a supply to drink and cook with, to homes in Cantua Creek.
 ?? John Blanchard / The Chronicle ??
John Blanchard / The Chronicle

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States