San Francisco Chronicle - (Sunday)

Walmart sues U. S. government in opioid abuse battle

- By Anne D’Innocenzio Anne D’Innocenzio is an Associated Press writer.

Walmart is suing the U. S. government in a preemptive strike in the battle over its responsibi­lity in the opioid abuse crisis.

The government is expected to take civil action against the world’s largest retailer, seeking big financial penalties, for the role its pharmacies may have played in the crisis by filling opioid prescripti­ons.

But on Thursday, Walmart filed a lawsuit saying that the Justice Department and the Drug Enforcemen­t Administra­tion are blaming the company for the government’s own lack of regulatory and enforcemen­t policies to stem the crisis.

Walmart says it is seeking a declaratio­n from a federal judge that the government has no lawful basis for seeking civil damages from the company. It is also seeking to clarify its legal rights and duties under the Controlled Substance Act.

Walmart operates more than 5,000 pharmacies in its stores around the country.

“Walmart and its pharmacist­s find themselves in an untenable position,” the company based in Bentonvill­e, Ark., says in the lawsuit filed in the U. S. District Court in the Eastern District of Texas. “Under defendants’ sweeping view, Walmart and its pharmacist­s may be held liable — perhaps even criminally — for failing to secondgues­s DEA-registered doctors and refuse their prescripti­ons. But if pharmacist­s do so, they may face the wrath of state medical boards, the medical community at large, individual doctors, and patients.”

Walmart says in the suit that the Justice Department identified hundreds of doctors who have written problemati­c prescripti­ons that Walmart’s pharmacist­s allegedly should not have filled. But nearly 70% continue to have active registrati­ons with the DEA, the lawsuit says.

“In other words, defendants want to blame Walmart for continuing to fill purportedl­y bad prescripti­ons written by doctors that DEA and state regulators enabled to write those prescripti­ons in the first place and continue to stand by today,” the suit says.

The lawsuit names the Justice Department and Attorney General William Barr as defendants. It also names the DEA and its acting administra­tor, Timothy Shea.

In the suit, Walmart describes a government probe of the company that began in December 2016 and calls it a “misguided criminal investigat­ion” conducted by the U. S. Attorney’s office for the Eastern District of Texas. Walmart says it fully cooperated with the probe.

In the spring of 2018, the office advised that it intended to indict the company. In August 2018, Walmart said that officials at the Department of Justice recognized that there was no plausible basis for a criminal indictment, and the department formally declined to prosecute Walmart. But the civil investigat­ion continued.

The initial investigat­ion was a subject of a story in ProPublica published in March. ProPublica reported that Joe Brown, then U. S. attorney for the Eastern District of Texas office, spent years pursuing a criminal case against Walmart for its opioid prescripti­on practices, only to have it stymied after the retail giant’s lawyers appealed to senior officials in the Justice Department.

Two months later, Brown resigned. He didn’t give a reason for his departure except to say he would be “pursuing opportunit­ies in the private and public sectors” and “some of those will become apparent in the coming days. Brown went into private practice in the Dallas area A spokeswoma­n for the U. S. attorney’s office in Texas that handled the investigat­ion referred questions to the Justice Department in Washington. The Justice Department declined to comment.

 ?? Sue Ogrocki / Associated Press ?? Walmart’s suit is seen as a preemptive strike in the battle over responsibi­lity in the opioid abuse crisis.
Sue Ogrocki / Associated Press Walmart’s suit is seen as a preemptive strike in the battle over responsibi­lity in the opioid abuse crisis.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States