San Francisco Chronicle - (Sunday)

EPA rule would boost safeguards for clean water

- By Jim Salter and Michael Phillis

ST. LOUIS — President Biden’s administra­tion has finalized regulation­s that protect hundreds of thousands of small streams, wetlands and other waterways, repealing a Trump-era rule that federal courts had thrown out and that environmen­talists said left waterways vulnerable to pollution.

The rule defines which “waters of the United States” are protected by the Clean Water Act. For decades, the term has been a flashpoint between environmen­tal groups that want to broaden limits on pollution entering the nation’s waters and farmers, builders and industry groups that say extending regulation­s is onerous for business.

The Environmen­tal Protection Agency and the Department of the Army said the reworked rule is based on definition­s that were in place prior to 2015. Federal officials said they wrote a “durable definition” of waterways to reduce uncertaint­y.

In recent years, however, there has been a lot of uncertaint­y. After the Obama administra­tion sought to expand federal protection­s, the Trump administra­tion rolled them back as part of its unwinding of hundreds of environmen­tal and public health regulation­s. A federal judge rejected that effort. And a separate case is currently being considered by the Supreme Court that could yet upend the finalized rule.

“We have put forward a rule that’s clear, it’s durable, and it balances that protecting of our water resources with the needs of all water users, whether it’s farmers, ranchers, industry, watershed organizati­ons,” EPA Assistant Administra­tor for Water Radhika Fox told the Associated Press.

The new rule is built on a pre-2015 definition, but is more streamline­d, Fox said. The final rule will modestly increase protection­s for some streams, wetlands, lakes and ponds, she said.

The Trump-era rule, finalized

in 2020, was long sought by builders, oil and gas developers, farmers and others who complained about federal overreach that they said stretched into gullies, creeks and ravines on farmland and other private property.

Environmen­tal groups and public health advocates countered that the Trump rule allowed businesses to dump pollutants into unprotecte­d waterways

and fill in some wetlands, threatenin­g public water supplies downstream and harming wildlife and habitat.

“The Biden administra­tion restored needed clean water protection­s so that our nation’s waters are guarded against pollution for fishing, swimming, and as sources of drinking water,” Kelly Moser, senior attorney for the Southern Environmen­tal

Law Center’s Clean Water Defense Initiative, said in a statement.

Jon Devine, director of federal water policy for the Natural Resources Defense Council, called repealing the Trump-era rule a “smart move” that “comes at a time when we’re seeing unpreceden­ted attacks on federal clean water protection­s by polluters and their allies.”

 ?? Carlos Osorio/Associated Press ?? A great egret flies above a great blue heron inside the Detroit River Internatio­nal Wildlife Refuge in Trenton, Mich., in October. The EPA has finalized regulation­s to protect wetlands.
Carlos Osorio/Associated Press A great egret flies above a great blue heron inside the Detroit River Internatio­nal Wildlife Refuge in Trenton, Mich., in October. The EPA has finalized regulation­s to protect wetlands.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States