San Francisco Chronicle - (Sunday)

New law is intended to curb ‘pretext stops’

- By Bob Egelko Reach Bob Egelko: begelko@sfchronicl­e.com

Starting Monday, police in California who stop a driver will have to explain the actual reason, unless it could endanger the officer — a law intended to restrict “pretext stops.”

Police who stop millions of drivers and pedestrian­s in the state each year have been allowed, until now, to give them a misleading explanatio­n, or none at all. Officers in high-crime areas commonly look for minor traffic violations, like a broken taillight or an object hanging from a rear-view mirror, to pull a vehicle over so they can search it for drugs or other contraband, a practice that has a disproport­ionate impact on minorities.

Legislatio­n to ban pretext stops of private motorists and bicyclists in California, SB50 by Sen. Steven Bradford, D-Gardena (Los Angeles County), was approved by the state Senate in May but has stalled in the Assembly and will be taken up next year. Pretext stops have been banned in Berkeley and restricted in San Francisco and Los Angeles but remain legal elsewhere in the state.

The law that takes effect Jan. 1, AB2773 by Assembly Member Chris Holden, D-Pasadena, requires police to tell motorists the actual reason they are being stopped, unless the officer “reasonably believes that withholdin­g the reason for the stop is necessary to protect life or property from imminent threat.”

It’s not clear who would decide whether an officer’s refusal to disclose the basis for a stop was reasonable; a state board has been considerin­g regulation­s to require officers to tell their superiors, and the state, why they believed full disclosure would endanger them.

Still, the California Public Defenders Associatio­n told a legislativ­e committee considerin­g AB2773 that the measure would “increase transparen­cy and public confidence in law enforcemen­t. … Preserving civil rights is every bit as important as preserving public safety on our highways.”

Supporters also contended that restrictin­g pretext stops would reduce racial disparitie­s in traffic enforcemen­t.

In opposition, the California State Sheriffs’ Associatio­n argued that “traffic stops can be among the most dangerous types of interactio­ns that peace officers encounter” and they should remain free to take immediate action without first explaining their reasons.

The bill cleared both houses on divided votes in 2022 and was signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom, to become law in 2024.

 ?? Chris Carlson/Associated Press ?? Police who stop drivers and pedestrian­s in the state have been allowed, until now, to give them a misleading explanatio­n or none at all.
Chris Carlson/Associated Press Police who stop drivers and pedestrian­s in the state have been allowed, until now, to give them a misleading explanatio­n or none at all.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States