San Francisco Chronicle

Lee vows to veto cycling plan

Proposal would let riders treat stop signs as yields

- By Emily Green and Lizzie Johnson

Legislatio­n that would make ticketing bicyclists who roll through stop signs the lowest priority for San Francisco police has inflamed controvers­y at City Hall.

Mayor Ed Lee has pledged to veto any such legislatio­n, a preemptive strike against an ordinance Supervisor John Avalos introduced at the Board of Supervisor­s last week. It would permit bicyclists to treat a stop sign as a yield sign and ride through without stopping if they decide it is safe.

“I’m not willing to trade away safety for convenienc­e, and any new law that reaches my desk has to enhance public safety, not create potential conflicts that can harm our residents,” Lee told The Chronicle.

Avalos was unavailabl­e for comment, but he has said cyclists should follow the Golden Rule and argued that the pro-

posed ordinance would not discourage officers from citing bicyclists who don’t slow down at stop signs.

It is mirrored after a longstandi­ng Idaho law that allows bike riders to treat stop signs as yield signs, in effect allowing rolling stops when there’s no cross traffic. The state has had the law since 1982, resulting in a decrease in bicycle collisions with cars, causing injuries or deaths, according to some studies.

Co-sponsoring the legislatio­n are Supervisor­s London Breed, Jane Kim, Eric Mar, Scott Wiener and David Campos — leaving the legislatio­n two votes shy of the eight votes it would need to override a veto. “When you have a cyclist that is approachin­g an intersecti­on at a slow speed, cautiously and not violating anyone’s right of way, it doesn’t make sense to be ticketing them,” Wiener said. “That’s not creating any kind of danger. That’s not hurting anyone. That should not be the focus of law enforcemen­t.”

Bicyclists protest

The uniquely San Franciscan drama began in July when the new Park Station captain, John Stanford, pledged to crack down on bike riders ignoring stop signs or traffic signals, particular­ly along the popular Wiggle route between Market Street and the Panhandle.

That prompted scores of bike riders to participat­e in a “stopin” protest, during which they dutifully came to a full and complete stop — bike stopped, at least one foot on the pavement — at every stop sign and red light. The ride backed up traffic in some locations.

An online petition urging San Francisco police to end the purported crackdown on cyclists gathered more than 15,000 signatures on the Care2 website. And bike advocates posted a video that appears to show Stanford himself running a stop sign: www.facebook. com/wiggparty/posts/1015613 7637980038.

Practicall­y speaking, police rarely cite bicyclists for traffic violations. Bicyclists account for just 1 percent of traffic tickets in San Francisco, Police Chief Greg Suhr said. About 96 percent of tickets go to drivers and 3 percent to pedestrian­s.

Even so, Suhr said the Board of Supervisor­s should not pass legislatio­n that would hamstring officers’ discretion to ticket bicyclists. “The California vehicle code states that all vehicles should stop. We enforce the California vehicle code.”

The backdrop to the dispute is an ambitious campaign by city officials to eliminate all traffic deaths by 2024, an initiative that began when 21 pedestrian­s were killed in 2013. This year, 12 people have died in traffic collisions through June, according to the city — seven while walking, two on bikes and three on motorcycle­s.

Bob Planthold, a pedestrian safety and disabled rights advocate, said Avalos’ legislatio­n is “antisafety.”

“It essentiall­y says it is the bicyclists who decide whether and when it’s safe for anyone to cross an intersecti­on,” Planthold said. “The bicyclists live in a two-mode universe — that of bicyclists and motorists. And the pedestrian­s are extraneous, irrelevant, outside of the interests in bicyclists.”

The legislatio­n “tells the police to stay away,” he added.

3 measures vetoed

But Wiener contends the legislatio­n would not make the streets more dangerous or allow cyclists riding irrational­ly to avoid getting ticketed.

“If the cyclist is blowing through the intersecti­on and not entering slowly and cautiously, they absolutely should get a ticket,” he said. “But when you look at what is causing injury and death on our streets, it’s not a cyclist entering an intersecti­on at a few miles an hour.”

Lee has vetoed three pieces of legislatio­n in his 4½ years in office. He threatened a veto one other time, in 2013, over the city’s Due Process Ordinance limiting cooperatio­n with federal immigratio­n authoritie­s, before the parties came to a compromise.

 ?? James Tensuan / Special to The Chronicle ?? A bicyclist rides down Market Street in San Francisco. A proposed measure would let riders pass stop signs at their discretion.
James Tensuan / Special to The Chronicle A bicyclist rides down Market Street in San Francisco. A proposed measure would let riders pass stop signs at their discretion.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States