San Francisco Chronicle

Inquiry over U.S. trade deals

-

Regarding “Trump’s free trade puzzler” (Nov. 23): It is common wisdom that the North American Free Trade Agreement — and the World Trade Organizati­on, vis-a-vis China — are the sole cause of the decline in U.S. manufactur­ing and other jobs.

I am no free trade expert, but I skimmed over the text of the NAFTA agreement myself, and there is nothing I could find that particular­ly advantages Mexico. Instead, it eliminates the tariff protection of Mexico’s auto industry from foreign competitio­n, trade in agricultur­e, and lays out equal treatment of domestical­ly owned and foreign-owned businesses and services.

What Donald Trump would specifical­ly renegotiat­e I was unable to find. If there is something I overlooked, I would like to know what it is. There are things I did learn from other sources, however. U.S. foreign direct investment in China was $65.8 billion in 2014. In Mexico, U.S. foreign direct investment was $107.8 billion that year.

To my knowledge, there is no law or constituti­onal provision that would prevent U.S. corporatio­ns seeking the lowest-wage places on Earth to build new factories and assembly facilities, access suppliers, or develop technology ventures where a capable workforce exists. How does Trump intend to change that? Common wisdom so very often lacks wisdom.

Pat Willard, Redwood City

 ?? Tom Toles / Washington Post ??
Tom Toles / Washington Post

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States