San Francisco Chronicle

If Trump can’t win, we all lose

- © 2017, Washington Post Writers Group Email: ruben@ rubennavar­rette.com.

Last week, the White House learned a lesson: less tweeting, more speaking.

And I wound up facing a conundrum. What is an opinion writer to do when a president he didn’t vote for, and whom he doesn’t support, speaks to Congress and hits a home run?

And what if — despite concerns about his temperamen­t and policies — you find yourself agreeing with much of what the president said?

Someone would have to be a hard-core Donald Trump hater to not give the president props for a powerful, masterfull­y delivered speech that was full of inspiring messages.

To make sure, I turned my television to the cable network that is ground zero for hardcore Trump haters: CNN.

The president, in turn, is always on the attack against the network. He accuses it of trading in “fake news.”

Their relationsh­ip soured in January when CNN reported on the existence of an unverified intelligen­ce dossier alleging that Russia held compromisi­ng informatio­n about Trump.

After Trump’s address to Congress, CNN anchor Jake Tapper — who recently scolded the president for bashing the media — made a snide remark about how Trump did a good job of reading words that his speechwrit­ers had written for him.

CNN reporter Dana Bash was more fair. She gave Trump credit for a speech that was more presidenti­al than his uninspirin­g inaugural address.

A CNN/ORC poll of those who watched the speech found that 78 percent of Americans had a positive response, while only 21 percent responded negatively.

You can’t have a remarkable speech without memorable lines, and Trump delivered a few. Such as: “We are one people, with one destiny. We all bleed the same blood. We all salute the same flag. And we are all made by the same God.” And this one: “My job is not to represent the world. My job is to represent the United States of America.”

And, in a surprise, Trump also put in a good word for “real and positive immigratio­n reform” if we first “improve jobs and wages for Americans, strengthen our nation’s security, and restore respect for our laws.”

You would think that Democrats in the chamber would’ve cheered that line. Instead, they stayed planted in their seats and withheld their applause. Maybe that’s because many of them don’t want a solution to the immigratio­n problem and would rather have a campaign issue.

Of course, a speech is just a speech. Trump’s policies and priorities are more important. And there, all is not well.

For instance, the president is still cynically exploiting victims of crimes committed by people living in the country illegally. Now he is going so far as to create a special office in the Department of Homeland Security called VOICE (Victims of Immigratio­n Crime Engagement), which will serve as a liaison between victims of crimes committed by those living here without legal permission and Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t.

No word on whether the administra­tion is creating another office to address a much more frequent occurrence: crime committed by fully authorized visitors and U.S. citizens.

For those Americans who detest this president, there is no incentive to give Trump credit for a good speech. But you had better believe they’d be bashing him if he had given a bad one.

Trump can’t win. That’s a problem, because if he doesn’t succeed at some of what he’s trying to do, the country can’t move forward. And then we all lose.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States