San Francisco Chronicle

EPA dismisses 5 scientists from critical review board

- By Coral Davenport Coral Davenport is a New York Times writer.

WASHINGTON — The Environmen­tal Protection Agency has dismissed at least five members of a major scientific review board, the latest signal of what critics call a campaign by the Trump administra­tion to shrink the agency’s regulatory reach by reducing the role of academic research.

A spokesman for the EPA administra­tor, Scott Pruitt, said he would consider replacing the academic scientists with representa­tives from industries whose pollution the agency is supposed to regulate, as part of the wide net it plans to cast. “The administra­tor believes we should have people on this board who understand the impact of regulation­s on the regulated community,” said the spokesman, J.P. Freire.

Friday’s dismissals came about six weeks after the House passed a bill seeking to change the compositio­n of another EPA scientific review board to include more representa­tion from the corporate world.

President Trump has directed Pruitt to radically remake the EPA, pushing for deep cuts in its budget — including a 40 percent reduction for its main scientific branch — and instructin­g him to roll back major Obama-era regulation­s on climate change and clean water protection. In recent weeks, the agency has removed some scientific data on climate change from its websites, and Pruitt has publicly questioned the establishe­d science of human-caused climate change.

Freire said the agency wanted “to take as inclusive an approach to regulation as possible.”

“We want to expand the pool of applicants” for the scientific board, he said, “to as broad a range as possible, to include universiti­es that aren’t typically represente­d and issues that aren’t typically represente­d.”

Science advocates denounced the move as part of a broader push by the EPA to downgrade science and elevate business interests.

“This is completely part of a multifacet­ed effort to get science out of the way of a deregulati­on agenda,” said Ken Kimmell, the president of the Union of Concerned Scientists. “What seems to be premature removals of members of this Board of Science Counselors when the board has come out in favor of the EPA strengthen­ing its climate science, plus the severe cuts to research and developmen­t — you have to see all these things as interconne­cted.”

The board is charged with reviewing and evaluating the research conducted by the agency’s scientists. Those studies are used by government regulators to draft rules and restrictio­ns on everything from hazardous waste dumped in water to the emissions of carbon dioxide that contribute to climate change.

 ?? Stephen Crowley / New York Times ?? President Trump signs an order on climate change policies in Washington alongside EPA chief Scott Pruitt (left) in March.
Stephen Crowley / New York Times President Trump signs an order on climate change policies in Washington alongside EPA chief Scott Pruitt (left) in March.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States