San Francisco Chronicle

States try to reduce waste with new laws

- By Jon Frandsen Jon Frandsen is a Tribune News Service writer.

Every day, American families throw out tons of spoiled food — or food they think is spoiled because they misunderst­and “sell by” labels. Restaurant­s dispose of usable leftovers, and farmers toss imperfect produce.

In the United States, 30 to 40 percent of all food is not eaten. About 95 percent of that wasted food, 38 million tons in 2014, ends up in landfills or incinerato­rs, where it produces methane, a gas that is one of the most potent contributo­rs to climate change.

To protect the environmen­t, relieve hunger and save money, states are trying to reduce those numbers. California, Connecticu­t, Massachuse­tts, Rhode Island and Vermont already restrict the amount of food and other organic waste (such as soiled and compostabl­e paper and yard waste) that can be dumped in landfills. Maryland, New Jersey and New York are considerin­g similar laws.

States are offering tax breaks to farmers and small businesses that donate food rather than throw it away, limiting the liability of food donors, and standardiz­ing “use by” labels so consumers don’t toss food that is still edible.

New Jersey is considerin­g an award to prompt people to come up with productive ideas for making use of “ugly produce,” foods that are perfectly edible but shunned by retailers, processors and restaurant­s because of blemishes and other flaws.

The Food Waste Reduction Alliance, which represents the food industry and restaurant trade associatio­ns, recently worked with Harvard Law School’s Food Law and Policy Clinic to simplify and standardiz­e “use by” and “sell by” labels, which befuddle many consumers. People throw away a lot of edible food because they misunderst­and the difference between the two terms.

In 2015, the EPA and U.S. Department of Agricultur­e set a national goal of cutting food waste in half by 2030. To achieve it, the EPA laid out a broad strategy, which includes producing less food, using excess food to feed people in need, feeding scraps to livestock, using organic waste to produce energy or compost, and disposing of food in landfills and incinerato­rs only as a last resort.

Establishi­ng restrictio­ns on the amount of waste going to landfills is the toughest step to take: Only five states have such restrictio­ns, and four of them target only the largest producers.

Vermont, the least populous of the five, began phasing in its organic waste ban in 2014. By 2020, when the law will apply to all Vermont businesses and residents, it will be illegal to send any organic waste to landfills.

California also phased in its law. As of this year, its ban applies to all businesses (except for some in rural areas) that generate at least 4 cubic feet of organic waste a week. The goal is to cut by half the amount going to landfills by 2020.

David Biderman, who heads the Solid Waste Associatio­n of North America, cautioned that states shouldn’t rush into organic waste restrictio­ns without extensive planning.

“Some local government­s rushed into curbside recycling before they had adequate facilities and infrastruc­ture set up to handle it,” Biderman said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States