San Francisco Chronicle

Europe flunks Twitter’s hate-speech work

- By Mark Scott Mark Scott is a New York Times writer.

Twitter has failed to meet European standards for removing hate speech, figures published Thursday show, as pressure mounts, particular­ly on the Continent, for tech companies to do more to tackle such harmful material.

The battle between European policymake­rs and tech companies over what should be permitted online has pitted freedom of speech campaigner­s against those who say hate speech — in whatever form — has no place on the Internet.

In this standoff, European officials have called on Silicon Valley companies to take down at least half the hate speech from their services once they are notified, and they signed up the likes of Twitter, Facebook and Google to a voluntary code of conduct last year to combat the rising tide of harmful content.

But findings by the European Commission, the executive arm of the European Union, show that Twitter removed hate speech from its network less than 40 percent of the time after such content had been flagged to the company.

While the San Francisco company failed to meet the European standard, it has improved significan­tly from a study published late last year, which found that it removed a mere 19 percent of hate speech when notified.

It comes as pressure mounts on Twitter, whose revenue and user figures continue to stall, to clean up its act as the company has become one of the main mechanisms for Internet trolls to spread their messages.

Google and Facebook, by contrast, now comply with the region’s demands to take down at least half the hate speech, upon notificati­on, according to the study.

“We embarked in this process together, determined to bring about real changes for people who suffer from hatred and violence online,” Vera Jourova, the European commission­er of justice, consumers and gender equality, said in a statement Wednesday before the report’s publicatio­n. “The code of conduct on countering illegal hate speech online has delivered significan­t progress.”

In response, Twitter said it had invested in new reporting procedures to allow individual­s to flag probable hate speech, and that it is striving to balance people’s right to freedom of expression with the need to police material on its network.

“Our work will never be ‘done,’ ” Karen White, Twitter’s head of public policy in Europe, said in a statement.

Google and Facebook also said they had made it easier for organizati­ons and individual­s to report hate speech, and that they are continuing to invest to tackle such material across the region and elsewhere.

The European findings were based on about 2,500 potential instances of hate speech recorded by 34 nongovernm­ental organizati­ons in 24 of the EU’s 28 member states. These groups notified the tech companies of the possible abuse and recorded how the companies responded. The study was conducted over seven weeks through May 5.

Fifty-nine percent of the material flagged by these nongovernm­ental groups was removed by tech companies, according to the report. Just over half the notificati­ons were assessed by tech companies within the first 24 hours.

While the European findings were greeted with praise by Jourova, policymake­rs in several countries have said that they will take more action against tech companies if they do not go further in tackling hate speech online.

After the recent terrorist attack in Manchester, England, Theresa May, the country’s prime minister, called on tech companies to strengthen their monitoring of extremist speech online. And in Germany, lawmakers are planning legislatio­n that could lead to fines of up to $50 million if companies do not act quickly in policing harmful material.

 ?? Gordon Welters / New York Times ?? People visit Elbphilhar­monie, a concert hall in Hamburg, Germany. German lawmakers may penalize companies that do not act quickly to curb hate speech.
Gordon Welters / New York Times People visit Elbphilhar­monie, a concert hall in Hamburg, Germany. German lawmakers may penalize companies that do not act quickly to curb hate speech.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States