San Francisco Chronicle

Fund quake-warning system

- By Anne Kronenberg and Barbara Graff Anne Kronenberg is the executive director of the San Francisco Department of Emergency Management. Barb Graff is the director of the Seattle Office of Emergency Management. They are joined in this opinion by Cathey Eid

In his proposed federal budget for fiscal year 2018, President Trump claims the defining ambition of his plan is to unleash the dreams and power of American work and creativity by reprioriti­zing spending to advance safety and security that will spur economic growth. It makes no sense then that his plan eliminates funding for the developmen­t of the Earthquake Early Warning System. This would be extremely shortsight­ed.

An effective earthquake early-warning and notificati­on system is vital to advancing safety and security along the West Coast. As emergency managers, we dream of a fully functionin­g alert-and-notificati­on system embedded in schools, hospitals, fire stations, utilities and other critical facilities. We should not delay protecting our children: We must expedite our efforts to develop technology tied to earthquake early warnings that mitigate the risk of fires, which could turn into major conflagrat­ions that could engulf neighborho­ods.

Federal investment­s in a robust system will continue to stimulate economic growth, as applicatio­ns and services able to quickly translate and integrate alerts into protective and preventive measures are commercial­ized.

Today, the system — even in its nascent stages — successful­ly can detect and notify users of an impending earthquake. During the 2014 Napa earthquake, testing stations on BART and in San Francisco received eight to nine seconds warning. In a repeat of the 2001 Nisqually earthquake, 15 seconds warning would be given to Seattle or Portland, Ore., and much more for a repeat of the great Cascadia earthquake.

System developers are on the cusp of launching the first public rollout in the Bay Area, Los Angeles and the Seattle/Tacoma area within the next year. Therefore, after finalizing agreements with local jurisdicti­ons, warning systems would be in place to notify emergency responders of an impending tremor. Fire stations would be provided those indispensa­ble seconds critical to rolling up doors, ensuring life-saving resources aren’t trapped. Rail systems will have time to slow or stop trains decreasing the risk of derailment. Schoolchil­dren and faculty would have time to drop, cover and hold on before the earth starts shaking.

According to Bay Area Earthquake Plan prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the California Office of Emergency Services, the Bay Area could see almost 223,000 casualties, including more than 2,500 fatalities, with a magnitude 7.8 earthquake along the San Andreas Fault. The Earthquake Early Warning System will save lives by enabling systems to take automated action and people to take protective action to keep out of harm’s way. In the future, as developers work with the telecommun­ications industry, the technology will be available for people to receive as notificati­ons on their mobile devices.

After years of research, testing and advocacy, eliminatin­g this program would deny our communitie­s the advances and benefits of the protection of life and property. Reckless abandonmen­t of this effort as we near the launch of a system along the West Coast would be a reversal of our ingenuity and lifesaving innovation­s.

The Earthquake Early Warning System needs scientists, engineers and technician­s to maintain it. Another $16 million above the program’s current budget is needed annually to operate the system. Such an investment drives the evolution of the technology. This will buy more time before a crisis, put people to work, and ultimately serves our goal of saving lives and protecting property.

The public should demand investment in the Earthquake Early Warning System and urge the Trump administra­tion and Congress not to abandon this critical investment. Show your support by writing, emailing, or tweeting your congressio­nal representa­tive (www.house.gov/ representa­tives/find).

The engineers, scientists and technician­s have spent years developing the system with whatever support and funding they could cobble together. Now, they need your support as they make their case to the White House and Congress.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States