San Francisco Chronicle

A better future for our foster youth

- By Michael Miller Michael Miller is director of the San Joaquin County Human Services Agency. San Joaquin County residents interested in becoming a resource family should call (209) 465-5437.

There is no higher calling for government than protecting abused and neglected kids. Counselors on the front lines in San Joaquin County’s shelter for foster children are committed to providing a safe refuge for traumatize­d youth.

A recent series in The San Francisco Chronicle reported what we all know to be true — our system is far from perfect. The articles found that, too often, California’s network of shelters rely on law enforcemen­t for help when volatile children act out. But first, some context. Shelters like ours are temporary homes for children removed from their families as a result of abuse or neglect. They range from infancy to age 18 and may stay only a day or, historical­ly, for months. Last year, about 5,400 kids spent time in California’s shelters, which are run directly by county government­s or nonprofit organizati­ons.

We acknowledg­e that our practices at Mary Graham Children’s Shelter near Stockton can improve, and we’re constantly striving to enhance our services to create more hopeful futures for kids. We also agree that keeping foster youth out of the juvenile justice system is a key priority.

Some of the statistics in The Chronicle, however, may have created the wrong impression about the nature and reason for the number of phone calls. Here’s one example.

The article reported that in 2015 and 2016 our shelter housed 1,122 youths and made 5,049 calls to law enforcemen­t. While those numbers are significan­t, 9 out of 10 of those calls were for youth leaving the shelter and returning later. Under state law, children can leave shelter grounds. However, Mary Graham uses extreme caution to ensure a child’s safety by contacting law enforcemen­t once when youths leave and then again when they return. That’s why the calls are so frequent.

Even so, we’ve been working aggressive­ly to reshape our approach under a state law that took effect Jan. 1. Our goal is to reduce reliance on all congregate-care facilities, including shelters, by expanding homebased placements for kids and ensuring that children who need intensive care receive immediate treatment. Our initiative­s include: Increasing staff training with a focus on trauma-related services.

Improving shelter staff-tochild ratios to 1-to-4 instead of 1-to-6.

Improving family-finding services and locating more foster families to host children.

Launching a new licensing system to expand our resource family network.

Expanding the availabili­ty of mental health services and ensuring that youth who need intensive care and supervisio­n are accepted into short-term residentia­l treatment programs.

These changes have produced encouragin­g results. The average daily occupancy at Mary Graham has decreased by half, and law enforcemen­t calls have decreased 73 percent, compared with the same period in 2016. From January to the end of May, only 10 juvenile bookings were reported, or an average of two per month. That compares with the average of more than eight bookings per month cited by The Chronicle for 2015 and 2016.

Our work does not end here. We will remain vigilant to ensure our foster care system provides the best possible protection and support for the children entrusted in our care.

 ?? Leah Millis / The Chronicle ?? Tony Rocha, a deputy director of the Mary Graham Children’s Shelter in French Camp (San Joaquin County), shows a dorm.
Leah Millis / The Chronicle Tony Rocha, a deputy director of the Mary Graham Children’s Shelter in French Camp (San Joaquin County), shows a dorm.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States