San Francisco Chronicle

Hyperloop challenge

- By Dane Egli Dane Egli, former National Security Council director, is president of the nonprofit Hyperloop Advanced Research Partnershi­p.

Afederal government official reportedly gave Elon Musk the nod for a hyperloop route from New York City to Washington — but what is the reality?

I believe hyperloop technology is not only possible, but it represents a bold new discovery in transporta­tion innovation whose time has arrived.

Further, it represents an inflection point in national security because of its potential to propel our strategic advantage beyond our competitor­s in addressing internatio­nal threats and in asserting homeland security.

This concept has the science, technology, excitement, curiosity and money to move transporta­tion innovation as did the advancemen­t of manned aviation from Kitty Hawk to Chuck Yeager. But is that enough?

Like the interstate highway system (authorized in 1956) envisioned, designed and constructe­d during the Eisenhower administra­tion, it will require empowered political leaders and commercial investors who understand this is more than transporta­tion infrastruc­ture and speedy trains.

Technology is not the primary hurdle. The most vexing challenges for developers will be political will, access to key nodes such as maritime ports, and design standardiz­ation.

For example, we have seen the reinventio­n of new technologi­es in the past decade in ways and at speeds never imagined — robotics, 3-D printing, autonomous vehicles and artificial intelligen­ce, to name a few. Those are harbingers for what can happen in the highspeed transporta­tion area.

But are the many emerging tube and hyperloop companies willing to coordinate, collaborat­e and integrate to forge the consensus and “sharing economy” necessary to reinvent transporta­tion for the public good? Or will this community of competitor­s — including Hyperloop One, ET3, HTT, Arrivo, Hypernet Holding Corp., Hardt, SpaceX, AECOM and TransPod — conduct themselves as market scalpers, as did the railroads 200 years ago?

The rail industry provides a negative example in the developmen­t of highspeed pod transporta­tion in the 21st century because trains are operated in a slow, costly and environmen­tally inefficien­t manner. And only 55 percent of the railway track gauge is standardiz­ed globally to this day. Hyperloop must do better. This isn’t just building new products such as the Tesla, iPhones or lithium ion batteries. It is a disruptive technology that will require more than a government official giving a wealthy futurist a thumbs-up.

The most compelling feature of highspeed tube transporta­tion is that it will transport goods and passengers more quickly. Also, it will relieve traffic congestion on roads, rivers, railways and airports with a more efficient and accessible conveyance. In the process, it will bring accelerate­d, green, safe transport to a complex supply chain — infusing a new level of resilience and growth to our fragile economy.

As Henry Ford and the Wright brothers discovered, capturing the imaginatio­n of government leaders, smart researcher­s and venture capitalist­s is one thing, but bringing competing companies together to launch a new form of transporta­tion is another. We must coordinate as public, private and academic partners to reinvent and commercial­ize tube transporta­tion in the 21st century.

 ?? David Becker / Getty Images 2016 ?? People walk through a tube after a Hyperloop One test in Nevada.
David Becker / Getty Images 2016 People walk through a tube after a Hyperloop One test in Nevada.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States