San Francisco Chronicle

Impossible Burger’s unlikely controvers­y

Environmen­tal groups cry foul over food-safety issues

- By Tara Duggan

Two entities that seem like they should be on the same page — a coalition of environmen­tal groups and a plantbased food company — are at odds.

And the flash point is a veggie burger.

Impossible Foods in Redwood City is facing scrutiny about the safety of a key ingredient in its trademark Impossible Burger, commonly known as “the veggie burger that bleeds.”

In a letter published Thursday, the company’s CEO and founder, Patrick Brown, lashed out at media coverage that he said misreprese­nted how food safety regulation works and falsely implied that Impossible Foods was trying to evade U.S. Food and Drug Administra­tion enforcemen­t.

“We did everything as responsibl­y as we possibly could,” Brown said in an interview. “We went through every practice that is used by anyone to assess the safety of a new protein in the system.”

The ingredient in question is bioenginee­red soy leghemoglo­bin, which gives the Impossible Burger its bloody red hue and meat-like flavor. The controvers­y arose on Tuesday when the New York Times published an article highlighti­ng correspond­ence between the FDA and Impossible Foods that environmen­tal groups say indicates that the protein had not met the agency’s approval before going to market about a

year ago. Brown said the company has followed all safety regulation­s for its plant-based burger and has been conducting extra voluntary safety testing since 2014.

The dustup demonstrat­es how environmen­tal advocates and food technology startups can clash even when they share many larger sustainabi­lity goals. A Stanford biochemist­ry professor emeritus, Brown said he founded the company to reduce the environmen­tal impact of the food system. But the company’s use of biotechnol­ogy — the soy leghemoglo­bin is produced through genetic engineerin­g — has brought both positive and negative attention.

“Currently our FDA, EPA and USDA regulation­s are falling behind the very quickly moving developmen­t of new technologi­es, and one of the ways that our regulatory agencies are falling behind is they are not assessing the process of geneticall­y engineerin­g these ingredient­s,” said Dana Perls of Friends of the Earth, one of the groups that raised concerns about Impossible Foods’ safety testing.

Unlike drug companies, food companies are not required to seek approval from the FDA when they debut a new product. But Brown said that because its soy leghemoglo­bin — what the company calls “heme” for short — is unfamiliar to the public and comes from a protein in the root of a soy plant that is generally not eaten, it decided to do extra testing.

“It’s not just (about) safety, but our responsibi­lity to be transparen­t to consumers about what’s in our product, why it’s in our product and everything we know about it that they might care about,” said Brown, who added that he is an advocate for transparen­cy as the co-founder of Public Library of Science, which makes access to scientific research open-source.

Though soy leghemoglo­bin is molecularl­y identical to the heme in meats and vegetables, Brown said, the company tested the protein in the lab to see whether it had any similariti­es with known allergens. They then sent the results to a panel that included faculty from a food allergy research center at the University of Nebraska, which found the protein safe for humans to eat.

Later, Impossible Foods voluntaril­y submitted the test results to the FDA in the hope of earning a status called Generally Recognized as Safe, or GRAS. Few traditiona­l food companies make that extra effort, although San Francisco’s Hampton Creek announced this week that a mung-bean protein it

“The vast majority of their effort is an antiscienc­e, anti-GMO crusade.” Patrick Brown, CEO and founder of Impossible Foods

plans to use in a scramblede­gg replacemen­t just received GRAS status from the FDA.

The FDA did not grant that status to Impossible Foods’ heme in 2015. At the time, the organizati­on wrote that it “believes that the arguments presented, individual­ly and collective­ly, do not establish the safety of SLH (soy leghemoglo­bin) for consumptio­n,” according to documents obtained by Friends of the Earth and the environmen­tal and food safety groups ETC and Consumers Union, through a Freedom of Informatio­n request, and shared with the media.

In a joint statement, the groups argued that the company should have waited to debut the Impossible Burger if the FDA still had questions about the testing process.

Impossible Foods raised more than $250 million in funding from the likes of Bill Gates, with a new 67,000square-foot Oakland factory scheduled to open this fall. The burger is now served in over 40 restaurant­s.

An Impossible Foods spokeswoma­n said that the FDA told the company at the time that the industry standard was to perform animal testing, something the company had initially avoided because of animal welfare concerns — after all, it is a veggie-burger company. But it eventually proceeded with testing the product on rats, giving them enough heme to reach the equivalent of 200 times what an average American eats daily in ground beef to no ill effects, Brown said.

“The rat tests came back clean as a whistle,” Brown said.

The rise of food technology companies centered in the Bay Area has brought the food regulation system under scrutiny, especially because it allows companies to conduct their own testing.

“We need to overhaul our regulation­s,” said Perls of Friends of the Earth. “We need the FDA to be fully in charge of food safety. We need objective third-party assessment­s.”

Brown said the groups’ objections are more about the use of biotechnol­ogy than the product itself.

“The vast majority of their effort is an antiscienc­e, antiGMO crusade,” Brown said. “Their strategy has tended to be to try to effectivel­y take down any company that is using biotechnol­ogy by whatever means they can come up with.”

Impossible Foods had its expert panel approve its latest animal tests and will submit the new testing data to the FDA later this month. If the FDA has no questions, the process will be final.

 ?? Gabrielle Lurie / The Chronicle ?? Kevin Hong (right) throws a ball of plant-based meat into a bowl in the Impossible Foods kitchen.
Gabrielle Lurie / The Chronicle Kevin Hong (right) throws a ball of plant-based meat into a bowl in the Impossible Foods kitchen.
 ??  ?? Top: Sous chef Kyle Wernke (center) calls to a waiter to tell him the Impossible Burgers are ready to serve at Cockscomb restaurant in San Francisco. Above: Sameer Narang (left) bites into an Impossible Burger during lunch with Jay Gierak at Cockscomb.
Top: Sous chef Kyle Wernke (center) calls to a waiter to tell him the Impossible Burgers are ready to serve at Cockscomb restaurant in San Francisco. Above: Sameer Narang (left) bites into an Impossible Burger during lunch with Jay Gierak at Cockscomb.
 ?? Photos by Gabrielle Lurie / The Chronicle ??
Photos by Gabrielle Lurie / The Chronicle

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States