San Francisco Chronicle

Malware expert could expose Russian hacking

- By Andrew E. Kramer and Andrew Higgins Andrew E. Kramer and Andrew Higgins are New York Times writers.

KIEV, Ukraine — The hacker, known only by his online alias “Profexer,” kept a low profile. He wrote computer code alone in an apartment and quietly sold his handiwork on the anonymous portion of the Internet known as the dark Web. Last winter, he suddenly went dark entirely.

Profexer’s posts, already accessible only to a small band of fellow hackers and cybercrimi­nals looking for software tips, blinked out in January — just days after U.S. intelligen­ce agencies publicly identified a program he had written as one tool used in the hacking of the Democratic National Committee.

But while Profexer’s online persona vanished, a flesh-and-blood person has emerged: a fearful man who Ukrainian police said turned himself in early this year and has now become a witness for the FBI.

“I don’t know what will happen,” he wrote in one of his last messages posted on a restricted­access website before going to the police. “It won’t be pleasant. But I’m still alive.”

It is the first known instance of a living witness emerging from the arid mass of technical detail that has so far shaped the investigat­ion into the DNC hack and the heated debate it has stirred. Ukrainian police declined to divulge the man’s name or other details, other than that he is living in Ukraine and has not been arrested. There is no evidence that Profexer worked, at least knowingly, for Russia’s intelligen­ce services, but his malware apparently did.

That a hacking operation that Washington is convinced was orchestrat­ed by Moscow would obtain malware from a source in Ukraine — perhaps the Kremlin’s most bitter enemy — sheds considerab­le light on the Russian security services’ modus operandi in what Western intelligen­ce agencies say is their clandestin­e cyberwar against the U.S. and Europe.

It does not suggest a compact team of government employees who write all their own code and carry out attacks during office hours in Moscow or St. Petersburg, but rather a far looser enterprise that draws on talent and hacking tools wherever they can be found.

Also emerging from Ukraine is a sharper picture of what the U.S. believes is a Russian government hacking group known as Advanced Persistent Threat 28 or Fancy Bear.

Rather than training, arming and deploying hackers to carry out a specific mission like just another military unit, Fancy Bear and its twin Cozy Bear have operated more as centers for organizati­on and financing; much of the hard work like coding is outsourced to private and often crime-tainted vendors.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States