San Francisco Chronicle

Predicting the economic future

- By P.J. O’Rourke

Thirty years ago, when the Independen­t Institute was founded, many of the economic institutio­ns that have helped expand our choices in recent years — Amazon, eBay, Facebook, Google, Lyft, Uber, Airbnb — weren’t around.

So perhaps this is a good time to ask, “What’s the economy going to be like 30 years from now?”

At a micro level — for those of us in the age demographi­c that reads about economics for pleasure — the outlook is grim. We’ll be dead.

For the living, my prediction is that the economy will be what it’s predicted to be. Like most social sciences, economics tends to produce self-fulfilling prophecies.

The concept was first described by Columbia University Professor Robert K. Merton in his landmark 1949 book, “Social Theory and Social Structure”: “The self-fulfilling prophecy is, in the beginning, a false definition of a situation, evoking a new behavior which makes the original false conception come true. This specious validity of the self-fulfilling prophecy perpetuate­s a reign of error.”

“Reign of error” is as good a definition as any of economics.

Robert K. Merton was the father of modern sociology. He also was the father of Robert C. Merton, who won the Nobel Prize in economics in 1997 for his work on the Black-Scholes formula, a staple of prediction of futures-option pricing for hedge funds. The younger Merton also was a partner in Long-Term Capital Management, the hedge fund that lost $4.6 billion in 1998.

Not that Robert C. Merton’s prediction­s didn’t come just as true as his dad’s. Robert C. predicted that hedge funds could make a lot of money using sophistica­ted mathematic­al models. Then all the other hedge funds began using sophistica­ted mathematic­al models. Some made a lot of money. LTCM wasn’t one of them.

Two of the earliest — and most accurate — economic prognostic­ators were Adam Smith and Karl Marx. Their prediction­s came true. But perhaps their prediction­s came true because these two enormously influentia­l thinkers made those prediction­s.

Adam Smith forecast the abandonmen­t of precious metal coinage in favor of paper money to replace “a very expensive instrument of commerce with one much less costly.” He foretold quantitati­ve easing: “The banks, they seem to have thought, were in honour bound to supply the deficiency, and to provide them with all the capital which they wanted to trade with.” And he predicted, too rightly, what would happen to “the Daedalian wings of paper money” if it became fiat currency untethered to any measure of value.

Smith is sometimes faulted for not foreseeing the Industrial Revolution. He didn’t foresee it because he knew it was already happening. “The productive powers of ... labourers cannot be increased, but in the consequenc­e ... of some addition and improvemen­t to those machines and instrument­s which facilitate and abridge labour.”

Karl Marx was wrong about communism. But that was just a harebraine­d idea he had. His prediction­s are another matter. In “The Communist Manifesto,” published in 1848, he showed great prescience: Disappeara­nce of the middle class. Read all about it in every news outlet. Confiscati­on of bourgeois property. The EPA called. Heavy taxation. So did the IRS. Liberation of women. Done. Dissolutio­n of the nuclear family. Check. Working without material incentive. “The sharing economy.” Free public education. And worth it. Centraliza­tion of banking and credit in the hands of the state. Were you invited to the last Fed meeting? Combinatio­n of agricultur­e with manufactur­ing. Chicken fingers. Proletaria­t becomes the ruling class. The lumpenprol­etariat in Donald Trump’s case, albeit a very rich one.

Our wishes will come true. I won’t bother to mention being careful about what we wish for.

Political satirist P.J. O’Rourke, a member of the board of advisers for the Independen­t Institute in Oakland, is the author, most recently, of “How the Hell Did This Happen? The Election of 2016.” He will be the master of ceremonies at the institute’s 30th anniversar­y dinner, focusing on “The Future of Liberty,” Sept. 22 at the Ritz-Carlton, San Francisco.

 ?? Uwe Meinhold / AFP / Getty Images 2008 ?? Karl Marx was wrong about communism but his economic prediction­s were spot on.
Uwe Meinhold / AFP / Getty Images 2008 Karl Marx was wrong about communism but his economic prediction­s were spot on.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States