San Francisco Chronicle

Labor’s grip on Capitol

-

Aunion-backed bill to pad local government payrolls has been steadily diminished by those with the clout to fend off organized labor and its numerous friends in the California Legislatur­e. The state’s cities got a reprieve from the bill en masse. So did San Francisco, the state’s only city and county, and Santa Clara County. All that’s left for the state Senate is to finish the job and kill this misbegotte­n bill altogether.

The winnowing of recent months left 56 of the state’s 58 counties still subject, for no compelling policy reason, to AB1250, which effectivel­y prohibits an array of private firms and nonprofits from doing government work. Backed by the Service Employees Internatio­nal Union and authored by Democratic Los Angeles Assemblyma­n Reginald Jones-Sawyer, a former SEIU official, the bill broadly requires contracts for services “currently or customaril­y performed” by government employees to meet a litany of conditions.

Counties would, for example, have to ensure that contractor­s don’t take the place of actual or potential public employees, show that a contract’s benefits aren’t “outweighed by the public’s interest” in hiring government workers, and compel contractor­s to divulge all claims and complaints against them within the past decade and identify all the employees and subcontrac­tors doing the work.

The bill’s onerous conditions leave little doubt that its intent is to discourage and eliminate private contracts in favor of expanding government payrolls and union membership. It threatens to needlessly inflate public spending and disrupt a range of services, many of them routinely provided by nonprofits serving the homeless, the mentally ill and other vulnerable people. A legislativ­e analysis found that the bill would bring about “potentiall­y major local cost increases or service reductions” and could affect “a broad array of services.”

It’s disturbing enough that the Democratic majority has moved this bill as far as it’s come. But it’s not the only exercise in union water-carrying being seriously considered in Sacramento.

AB1513, by Assemblyma­n Ash Kalra, D-San Jose, would require the state to provide home health workers’ names and contact informatio­n to unions for organizing purposes. AB251, by Assemblyma­n Rob Bonta, D-Alameda, and SB349, by Sen. Ricardo Lara, D-Bell Gardens (Los Angeles County), would impose extraordin­ary staffing and financial requiremen­ts on dialysis centers. All are backed by the SEIU, which according to state records is linked to more than $5 million in contributi­ons to legislativ­e candidates in the current election cycle alone.

Granted, no one can blame union organizers for trying to expand their ranks by any means available. But the Legislatur­e doesn’t have to spend so much of its time and energy doing it for them.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States