San Francisco Chronicle

Trump supporters:

- By Joe Garofoli Joe Garofoli is The San Francisco Chronicle’s senior political writer. Email: jgarofoli@sfchronicl­e.com Twitter: @joegarofol­i

President’s base applauds end to “special rights” for young immigrants.

While President Trump’s opponents took to the streets Tuesday to protest his decision to end Obama-era protection­s for young undocument­ed immigrants, his core supporters loved it.

Politicall­y, Trump’s decision Tuesday to rescind the 5-yearold Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program was a valentine to his base, the 39 percent of Americans who approve of the job he’s been doing and for whom immigratio­n is a driving issue.

The question is whether any near-term support Trump gains from his base is worth the long-term damage he may incur by potentiall­y alienating the rapidly growing Latino and Asian American voting blocs — particular­ly in California, home to an estimated 200,000 people in the DACA program, more than any other state.

However, to Trump supporters like Randall Jordan, the president’s decision was a matter of keeping a campaign promise to end former President Barack Obama’s immigratio­n policy, which was implemente­d by executive order.

Jordan, a San Luis Obispo contractor, appreciate­d seeing action on immigratio­n reform after years of watching Congress accomplish nothing. He believes Trump was trying to deal compassion­ately with the young immigrants, known as “Dreamers,” who were brought here as children, even though the president’s action could ultimately cause them to lose legal protection­s against being deported.

Plus, Jordan thought Tuesday’s move was good public policy.

“He’s doing the right thing — presidents shouldn’t be making executive orders,” Jordan, said referring to Obama’s original DACA order. “And he’s being compassion­ate — he’s giving (the Dreamers time) to figure out what to do.”

Jordan represente­d the 79 percent of Trump voters for whom immigratio­n was an important issue, behind only “the economy” and “terrorism,” in the 2016 election, according to a Pew Research survey. It was far lower on the priority list for Hillary Clinton backers.

Conservati­ves like West Walker, a schoolteac­her from Stockton who is state chairman of California­ns for Trump, feel that immigrants covered by DACA “are a privileged class — they were getting special rights. That isn’t right at a time when there’s a lot of needs in the state.”

But attitudes toward undocument­ed immigrants are more sympatheti­c across California. Half the state’s residents say they worry “a lot” (30 percent) or “some” (21 percent) that someone they know could be deported, according to a May survey from the nonpartisa­n Public Policy Institute of California.

Despite that compassion, few conservati­ves expect the fate of the DACA program to swing many voters in the 2018 midterm elections — even in the nine California Congressio­nal districts held by Republican­s where Clinton received more votes than Trump and that have been targeted by Democrats. Several of those districts, located in the Central Valley and Southern California, have significan­t numbers of Latino voters.

Orange County Republican Party chairman Fred Whitaker said the four targeted GOP Congressio­nal members whose districts touch his county all opposed Obama’s DACA executive order because they felt it was unconstitu­tional, “not because they wanted to throw anyone out of the country.”

Even though Orange County has an increasing number of new immigrants, Whitaker said, “I don’t think this is going to move any voters either way.”

If anything, some Trump supporters said the president may gain from his action, which was forced by nine Republican state attorneys general who said they would take legal action if Trump didn’t end DACA by Tuesday.

San Diego resident Woody Woodrum said the president was “backed into a corner,” knowing that Obama’s order would likely be overturned by the courts. He applauded Trump for telling Congress to pass comprehens­ive immigratio­n legislatio­n that would include protection­s for the Dreamers.

“The president is doing what a good executive does,” said Woodrum, who is president of the California Screaming Eagles, a conservati­ve group.

Still, he remained skeptical of Washington’s taking action. “How rapidly has Congress acted in the past? In the past, they haven’t taken to the task.”

California Republican Party Chairman Jim Brulte hopes that changes.

“The California Republican Party favors comprehens­ive immigratio­n reform and urges Republican­s and Democrats in Washington to work with the Trump administra­tion to craft a comprehens­ive immigratio­n package that addresses DACA and every other element of the immigratio­n debate,” Brulte said in an email.

Yet while a few Congressio­nal Republican­s, like House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., have expressed sympathy for those covered by DACA in recent days, “there are no votes in the House” for legislatio­n to protect them, said Jim Carafano, a policy analyst at the conservati­ve Heritage Foundation think tank. The hope of passing a comprehens­ive immigratio­n package is even more remote, he said.

If an immigratio­n bill were to surface, even one tailored narrowly just to cover those covered by DACA, Carafano said conservati­ves would try to kill it by saying, “‘It starts with the Dreamer kids. Then you’ll want their parents to get amnesty, too. Then, hey, why not do it with everyone’ ” who is in the country illegally?

On Tuesday after his decision was announced, Trump tried to appeal to both his base and those outside it, saying that he had “a love for these people, and hopefully, now Congress will be able to help them and do it properly.”

Fred Schein, president of the Log Cabin Republican­s of Marin County, had mixed feelings.

“I don’t want to see them punished for their error of their parents,” said Schein, who lives in Mill Valley. But at the same time, he didn’t think it was right for Obama to bestow protection­s on them through executive action. “It may be one of those situations where there is no happy solution.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States