San Francisco Chronicle

New cancer treatment sees fast advances

- By Michelle Fay Cortez Michelle Fay Cortez is a Bloomberg writer. Email: mcortez@bloomberg.net

The last few weeks have been historic in the fight against cancer. Novartis got approval for the first treatment in a revolution­ary new class of drugs, shortly after Gilead Sciences Inc. spent $11.9 billion on a biotech company working in the field.

Neither can rest on its laurels. Research in the field is moving so fast that today’s breakthrou­ghs can easily become tomorrow’s hasbeens.

“I can’t think of any other therapies in oncology that have seen such rapid developmen­t,” said Rachel Webster, senior director of oncology at Decision Resources Group, a health care research and consulting firm in London. “In the coming months and years, with the new therapies that are brought to the market, the best will be the ones that win, not necessaril­y the first.”

The novel cell therapies that reprogram the body’s own immune system to attack tumors are just now coming of age, but their developers are already bracing for challenger­s. Unlike many traditiona­l drugs, being first isn’t enough. Rival products could eliminate the laborious, expensive process needed to make each treatment from scratch. And equipment manufactur­ers are developing technology to let hospitals and researcher­s produce the therapies called CAR-T themselves, sidesteppi­ng the drug companies’ laboratori­es.

“CAR-T therapy is in open water, vastly uncharted,” said Jay Bradner, president of Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, which is leading cell-therapy developmen­t at the Swiss drugmaker. “We have to make bold bets on where we can make the biggest impact.”

Part of the reason the first CAR-T products will be so vulnerable to newcomers comes from the complex process behind the treatments. Unlike mass-produced pills, the one-time treatments are tailored for each patient through an intricate, weeks-long process that involves extracting infectionf­ighting cells from blood; sending them to a manufactur­ing plant to get reprogramm­ed; and shipping them back to be reinfused into the patient at medical centers.

Competitio­n will come from a wide array of innovation­s that could simplify the process, from ready-to-use vials of donated cells that could be stored in hospitals to equipment the size of a large espresso machine that could create CAR-T therapies on-site. Companies developing technologi­es that could disrupt the CAR-T model range from biotech startups to giants like Johnson & Johnson and General Electric’s health care unit.

Among the most promising products on the horizon are off-theshelf versions of CAR-T, which stands for chimeric antigen receptors T-cell. The off-the-shelf versions use infectionf­ighting T-cells from healthy donors, rather than the patient’s own, meaning they could be made in large batches and be readily available. The current leader, the Paris firm Cellectis, hopes to have a product in the next two to three years, and companies including J&J are looking into such therapies, known as allogeneic transplant­s.

Cellectis’ product is licensed to Pfizer of New York and privately held Servier Laboratori­es in France. The companies have presented data on their first seven patients, including two dubbed the “London babies,” who responded to treatment under a compassion­ate use program.

“You can give these immediatel­y to the patients, without having to wait for manufactur­ing,” said Andre Choulika, CEO and co-founder of Cellectis. “This is the way to go.”

Novartis is also experiment­ing with allogeneic therapies, and Kite Pharma, the Los Angeles company being acquired by Gilead of Foster City for $11.9 billion, is considerin­g it. Gilead CEO John Milligan said Kite has what he called a pathway to allogeneic, but pointed to the risks inherent to grafts, including infections carried by donors and rejection.

Also emerging are manufactur­ing advances that would allow hospitals and researcher­s to produce CAR-T therapies themselves, bypassing drugmakers. Existing technology requires specialize­d clinicians and scientists to reengineer infection-fighting cells, a costly, complex process. That won’t be sustainabl­e as the drugs get approved for more types of cancer and they’re needed in far greater quantities, said Ger Brophy, general manager of GE Healthcare’s cell therapy business.

“We have to make sure hospitals globally have access so the potential of the therapy can be realized,” Brophy said. “This is a space that’s crying out for operationa­l efficiency.”

Miltenyi Biotec of Germany makes an allin-one system about the size of an espresso machine that can handle every step of the CAR-T manufactur­ing process. Researcher­s hang a bag of cells above the machine, which takes takes about two weeks to geneticall­y alter them.

Cancer patients in the U.S. and Europe have received experiment­al therapies made with the product, which costs about $185,000.

“Our vision is to decentrali­ze the manufactur­ing, so that the cells don’t have to be shipped all around the world and can be made close to where the patients are,” said Andrew Kaiser, a manager of immunother­apy and gene engineerin­g at Miltenyi. “The idea for us is to enable people to focus much more on the treatment and medical care and worry less about the hassle of the manufactur­ing.”

Fifteen years after researcher­s began to make strides in the field, the future of the treatments is still being decided, said Bruce Levine, who helped develop CAR-Ts and is a professor of cancer gene therapy at the University of Pennsylvan­ia’s Perelman School of Medicine.

“What I see is convergenc­e among different fields, in the robotics and automation industries, that is filtering into biotechnol­ogy and cell processing and gene therapy,” said Levine, who pioneered the manufactur­ing of CAR-T cells. “The trajectory is clearly up.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States