San Francisco Chronicle

California joins group of states suing administra­tion over decision to phase out program for “Dreamers.”

- Bob Egelko is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: begelko@ sfchronicl­e.com Twitter: @egelko

California “stands with the millions of immigrants who make this state a vibrant and prosperous place.”

Justice Department spokesman Devin O’Malley said it was the Obama administra­tion’s “circumvent­ion of Congress that got us to this point.”

The suit is the third in the past week to challenge Trump’s plan to end the DACA program unless Congress enacts it by law in six months. An additional 15 states and the District of Columbia filed the first suit in New York federal court, followed by a suit from the University of California, whose president, Janet Napolitano, drafted the DACA rules in President Barack Obama’s administra­tion in 2012.

DACA provides renewable two-year reprieves from deportatio­n to those who entered the U.S. without authorizat­ion before age 16, have attended school and have no serious criminal records. About one-fourth of the nearly 700,000 participan­ts are in California, and many were brought by their parents to the U.S. as children.

Monday’s lawsuit, joined by Democratic attorneys general from Maine, Maryland and Minnesota, argued that ending the program discrimina­tes against its participan­ts, and “violates fundamenta­l conception­s of justice,” by depriving them of a right to work legally and further their education.

The Trump administra­tion, the suit said, is also acting illegally by breaking the government’s promise under Obama to keep DACA applicants’ personal informatio­n confidenti­al. While the administra­tion has said it will not single out participan­ts in the program for deportatio­n, the states’ lawyers noted that Trump signed an executive order in January removing privacy protection­s from noncitizen­s, and has taken other steps to make DACA recipients’ “sensitive informatio­n” available to immigratio­n agents.

“These individual­s are now in danger of being placed in removal proceeding­s based on informatio­n they provided in reliance on (the government’s) promises,” the suit said.

Like the two previous suits, Monday’s filing also contends that repealing DACA is a substantiv­e step that requires the government to state legal reasons for its decision and solicit comments from the public before taking final action.

The only explanatio­n the Trump administra­tion has offered, the states said, was Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ muchdisput­ed, legally untested assertion that Obama acted unconstitu­tionally in establishi­ng the program by executive order.

The suit did not mention the fact that Napolitano, as Obama’s secretary of Homeland Security, did not solicit public comments before implementi­ng the rules for DACA.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States