San Francisco Chronicle

Hefner, an accidental revolution­ary

- Nancy L. Cohen is a historian and the author of “Delirium: The Politics of Sex in America.” Twitter: @nancylcohe­n By Nancy L. Cohen

Hugh Hefner, who died last week, has been heralded as the “leader” of the sexual revolution by friend, foe and a legion of headline writers and pundits alike. But the real credit belongs elsewhere. Women put the revolution in the sexual revolution. And it’s not over.

Hefner was an accidental revolution­ary, albeit one who enthusiast­ically and profitably embraced the title. He did have a feel for the zeitgeist of Cold War America and true entreprene­urial acumen, but mostly, he had the luck of good timing.

In 1960, Hefner opened the first Playboy Club. Another milestone that year would do far more to usher in the sexual revolution: the first birth control pill went on the market.

Efforts to control fertility are as old as civilizati­on itself. The Pill, however, was the first form of contracept­ion in world history that was exclusivel­y controlled by a woman. Convenient, affordable, and always on, the pill required neither the consent, participat­ion or knowledge of a woman’s partner.

Before the Pill, nine out of 10 people viewed a person who chose not to marry as “sick,” “neurotic” or “immoral” and believed premarital sex was wrong. Some states outlawed birth control — even for married couples. Sex out of wedlock was extremely risky for women, because accidental pregnancy imposed heavy costs on them. Single women who found themselves pregnant were offered the respectabl­e “choice” of a shotgun wedding or giving their child up for adoption. Abortion was illegal and extremely dangerous. A child born to a single woman went through life with a birth certificat­e stamped “illegitima­te.”

After the introducti­on of the Pill, the speed of change demonstrat­es just how much cultural coercion had kept women in their sexual place:

Within five years, 6 million American women were using the Pill.

The median age of first marriage rose, and the average number of children per family plummeted.

Women’s educationa­l attainment increased dramatical­ly, according to research by Harvard economists Claudia Goldin and Lawrence Katz. “A virtually foolproof, easy-to-use, and female-controlled contracept­ive does appear to have been important in promoting real change in the economic status of women,” they concluded.

When laws blocked women from obtaining contracept­ion, Planned Parenthood and other reproducti­ve-rights advocates challenged them in court, overturnin­g the bans and gaining constituti­onal protection of the right to control one’s own body. These intertwine­d medical, educationa­l, economic and legal innovation­s were fueled by and, in turn, fed a mass women’s movement.

What made the sexual revolution of the ’60s and ’70s an enduring social transforma­tion was the change in women’s identity and behavior. Feminists revived dormant ideas about gender equality and won over majority popular opinion to the principle that women have a right to control their own bodies. By the time girls born during the sexual revolution came of age, only 2 in 10 would be virgins at marriage.

The Pill, not Playboy, made it all possible. (After all, the double standard had facilitate­d men’s sexual adventuris­m passably well for decades before Playboy appeared on the newsstands.) But for women’s determinat­ion to control their own destiny while fully embracing their sexuality, Hefner would be going down in history as little more than a footnote.

What then is Hefner’s legacy?

Despite Hefner’s claims to be a cultural liberator of men and women alike, Playboy models and bunnies were paid to be objects of men’s desire, not full subjects in their own right. (Playboy’s female writers on the other hand, I can attest, were treated with equality and respect.) Playboy’s ideal of beauty was unattainab­le for most women. Hefner’s lifestyle, especially in his later years, was at best icky.

Still, Hefner deserves credit for launching a frontal assault against the soul-crushing repression of the 1950s, and more profoundly, the puritanica­l mores undergirdi­ng it. Hefner understood that sexual freedom is an intrinsic component of human freedom and human rights. He embraced his role as evangelist for sexual liberty with the zeal of a convert; he was the child of strict, emotionall­y distant, conservati­ve Methodists and a descendant of the Puritan governor of Plymouth Colony. Asked by the New York times 25 years ago what he was most proud of, Hefner answered, “That I changed attitudes toward sex. That nice people can live together now. That I decontamin­ated the notion of premarital sex.”

It was a worthy battle, and one that continues.

Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch has ruled that an employer’s religious beliefs take precedence over women’s rights to control their own bodies.

Alabama Republican­s have nominated a U.S. Senate candidate who said that “homosexual conduct” should be illegal.

Vice President Mike Pence refuses to dine alone with a woman other than his wife.

The Trump administra­tion has been hard at work underminin­g equal-pay protection­s and reproducti­ve health services, antidiscri­mination protection­s for LGBT Americans, and trying to expel transgende­r troops from the armed services.

The enemy of American values of tolerance, equality and freedom is a politicall­y resurgent religious right against, which Hefner fought passionate­ly — and imperfectl­y — his whole life.

 ?? Kin Cheung / Associated Press 2010 ?? Waitresses pose inside the Playboy Club at the Sands Casino in Macau. Playboy founder Hugh Hefner played an important, albeit secondary role, in changing America’s attitudes toward sex.
Kin Cheung / Associated Press 2010 Waitresses pose inside the Playboy Club at the Sands Casino in Macau. Playboy founder Hugh Hefner played an important, albeit secondary role, in changing America’s attitudes toward sex.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States