San Francisco Chronicle

Conservati­ve students allege UC retaliatio­n

- By Nanette Asimov Nanette Asimov is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: nasimov@sfchronicl­e.com Twitter: @NanetteAsi­mov

A group of conservati­ve UC Berkeley students told the U.S. Department of Justice this week that they canceled last week’s controvers­ial Free Speech Week event on campus for fear they would be “subjected to a criminal police investigat­ion” by the university.

The students are asking the Justice Department to investigat­e what they say is retaliatio­n by the university.

A lawyer for the Berkeley Patriot — the student group that invited far-right showman Milo Yiannopoul­os and other right-wing speakers to campus before canceling at the last minute — told the Justice Department Tuesday that the students were the targets of a police investigat­ion that UC Berkeley Chancellor Carol Christ announced on Sept. 21 specifical­ly to retaliate against them for filing a prior federal complaint.

Campus spokesman Dan Mogulof called the allegation­s “utterly unfounded” and said the complaint “seems like a desperate attempt to avoid any responsibi­lity for the collapse of the events.”

The investigat­ion by campus police looked at whether a hate crime occurred when someone hung posters from an antiMuslim organizati­on featuring images and names of individual faculty and students and calling them terrorist supporters, Christ told The Chronicle at the time. She said the police would also look at whether chalk messages on campus constitute­d a hate crime. The messages used a slur for gay people, called for a border wall against immigrants and to “deport them all,” and said that abortion is genocide.

Christ said the incidents were “very disturbing to me” and that many UC Berkeley students were brought to this country illegally as children. The chalkings are “horrible,” she said, and she characteri­zed the posters as “hate acts across campus.”

In the federal complaint, the students’ attorney, Marguerite Melo, characteri­zed them instead as “topics of interest of a conservati­ve-political nature.”

The complaint accuses Christ of blaming students for distributi­ng the posters and for creating the chalk messages, and claims that Christ implied as much in an all-campus email and in remarks to The Chronicle.

“Some of those students were affiliated or supporters of the Berkeley Patriot,” Melo told the Justice Department in the complaint.

The disclosure was the first indication that students had any role in the chalking or in distributi­ng the posters.

Melo said she interprete­d Christ’s message as saying that “conservati­ve students will be subjected to a criminal police investigat­ion (and implicitly a possible prosecutio­n) for exercising their First Amendment rights.”

Because of that, she said, the Berkeley Patriot group canceled Free Speech Week.

The new complaint does not mention that the lineup of announced speakers voluntaril­y dropped out or said they had never been invited in the first place. Nor does it say that the student group’s leaders had told The Chronicle that they canceled the event because they felt threatened about hosting the right-wing event on the left-leaning campus. In February, a riot caused the last-minute cancellati­on of another talk by Yiannopoul­os on campus.

The students from the Berkeley Patriot referred all questions to Melo, who said police had not questioned them.

Sgt. Sabrina Reich of the UC police said the investigat­ion is finished, and that no hate crime occurred. She said that after learning about the chalking on Sept. 18, officers spoke with students on Sproul Plaza, where the messages appeared.

“Upon investigat­ion, the content of the chalking was determined to be political slogans, and there was no hate speech involved,” Reich said. The posters included offensive speech, she said, but the contents “did not qualify as a haterelate­d incident” because it didn’t refer to any of the protected characteri­stics in the state penal code.

In their complaint, the students told the Justice Department that the investigat­ion was meant to get back at them for filing an earlier complaint, on Sept. 19, that claimed the campus “has become downright physically dangerous this past year for conservati­ve students.” It asked the federal agency’s Office of Civil Rights to investigat­e whether UC Berkeley has failed to protect the First Amendment rights of those students.

No one from the Justice Department has approached UC Berkeley, Mogulof said, noting that the campus had spent $800,000 on security for the event, though the students withdrew as sponsors.

“We aren’t in the habit of spending nearly $1 million on events we are trying to cancel,” he said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States