San Francisco Chronicle

California could ban cars that run on gas

But automakers might do it first

- By Kate Galbraith

In January, when the California Legislatur­e reconvenes, Assemblyma­n Phil Ting, DSan Francisco, plans to introduce a bill that would ban new vehicles that run on gasoline or diesel after 2040.

Automakers may not be too far behind.

Last week, Ford said it would reduce spending on internal combustion engines by a third, as it introduces 13 new electric and hybrid models in the next five years. General Motors promised at least 20 new electric models by 2023; Executive Vice President Mark Reuss said GM “believes in an all-electric future.”

Other manufactur­ers, from BMW to Volkswagen, also have announced substantia­l electric vehicle initiative­s. Volvo has said it will end production of cars with internal combustion engines starting in 2019. Jaguar Land Rover cars will be available in electric or hybrid versions by 2020. And Palo Alto’s Tesla continues to pump out emissions-free vehicles, with its $35,000 Model 3 — the most affordable car in its lineup — just starting to reach customers.

“There has been a paradigm shift,” said Daniel Sperling, a transporta­tion expert at UC Davis.

The spate of announceme­nts, he said, has been driven by the plunging cost of batteries, Europe’s discontent with diesel pollution, and China’s eagerness for electric cars.

Yet even as electric vehicles begin to move into the mainstream, experts believe incentives will be needed to make sure California­ns buy them, particular­ly in the near term. Since transporta­tion

accounts for 37 percent of the state’s greenhouse gas emissions, cars running on clean fuels will be essential to California’s long-term goal of slashing greenhouse gas emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050.

To get to there, “we need to transition the vast majority of our cars to electric,” with the electricit­y coming from renewable sources, said Don Anair, a clean vehicles specialist at the Union of Concerned Scientists.

So far this year, allelectri­c vehicles make up 2.5 percent of new vehicle registrati­ons in the state, according to the California New Car Dealers Associatio­n. Plug-in hybrids make up another 2.1 percent.

California is pushing for electric vehicles with a combinatio­n of rebates, carpool-lane privileges, charging-station investment­s and auto industry quotas.

Sperling, who also serves on the board overseeing the state’s Air Resources Board, which regulates pollution, said the resources board was not actively discussing a ban on new gasoline cars.

“Ban is not a good concept for such a major economic activity,” he said.

Still, bans of various types are under discussion in a range of countries, from China to France.

Bloomberg reported last month that Gov. Jerry Brown had asked the air board’s chief, Mary Nichols, about the possibilit­y of a ban. Air board spokesman Dave Clegern did not confirm or deny the report, saying only in a statement that the agency is looking at various options “including additional action on electric vehicles” to accelerate California’s clean-economy transition.

California could accomplish the ban from another angle by requiring emissions-free vehicles. The state already has a goal of having 1.5 million emissions-free vehicles on the road by 2025. Sperling said there’s a “good chance” that the mandate could be extended to 2030, but that could be the end of that particular policy if enough people are buying electric vehicles.

Asked whether the state would reach its 2025 zero-emissions vehicle goal, Sperling said, “Probably not but maybe. Hopefully, yes.”

The automaker announceme­nts are impressive, given that there were no electric vehicles for sale in California eight years ago, said Anair. But he said that while automakers “deserve applause for embracing electric vehicles,” they are at the same time “fighting (at the federal level) to relax standards that would actually require them to do that.”

Scott Hall, director of communicat­ions for the Alliance of Automobile Manufactur­ers, said in a statement that manufactur­ers “remain committed to more reductions in fuel use and greenhouse gas emissions, and that’s one reason why automakers are investing billions of dollars in advanced technologi­es, including electric vehicles.” Still, he added, “policy must ultimately align with marketplac­e realities like low fuel prices.”

The alliance has not taken a position on Ting’s planned legislatio­n, as it has not yet been introduced. The legislatio­n would ban the registrati­on of new gasoline or diesel-powered vehicles after 2040, said Ting, who commutes to Sacramento with an all-electric Chevy Bolt. (California cannot ban the sale of vehicles but can regulate their registrati­on.)

Ting hailed the automakers’ electric commitment­s. Asked whether the manufactur­ers might even end production of fossil fuel-powered cars before a potential ban took effect, he said he welcomed a “race to the finish line.”

“I think it would be great to get there sooner than 2040,” he said.

“Ban is not a good concept for such a major economic activity.” Daniel Sperling, transporta­tion expert at UC Davis and member of board overseeing the state Air Resources Board

 ?? General Motors ?? General Motors’ Chevy Bolt is among the all-electric vehicles recently introduced by automakers.
General Motors General Motors’ Chevy Bolt is among the all-electric vehicles recently introduced by automakers.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States