San Francisco Chronicle

Snapchat ups its game with sports, weather data

- By Paresh Dave Paresh Dave is a Los Angeles Times writer.

Snapchat isn’t a resource many turn to for weather and sports scores, but it’s spending increasing amounts of money on licensing deals to give users such informatio­n.

For Snapchat, the intention isn’t so much about helping people figure out how to dress that day or how their favorite team is doing. Rather, Snapchat’s aim is more interperso­nal: It’s loading up on live data so people can provide more context about their lives to friends.

That selfie of you sweating means more when people can see the temperatur­e is a verifiable 103 degrees. That video of a home run carries more weight when an animated scoreboard shows that it put the team ahead.

It’s unclear how much Snapchat maker Snap Inc. pays for data about forecasts and sports, from high school to profession­al leagues, because it doesn’t break down content-creation costs in its financial statement. But conversati­ons with data providers suggest that the deals are in line with industry norms.

Michael Pachter, managing director of stock research at Wedbush Securities, estimated that the weather data cost Snap at most about $48 million a year based on assumption­s of a 25-centper-user monthly fee and use by 10 percent of people on Snapchat. Another analyst put the cost closer to $10 million.

The most pressing question for Snap is whether it can continue to expand its informatio­n repertoire quickly and affordably as competitor­s such as Instagram race to catch up.

Snap has marketed itself to investors by saying that its new features will be unmatched, and that a low expense base puts it on a path toward profitabil­ity.

Data providers view their relationsh­ip with Snap as just the start — in terms of what’s possible for integratio­n with Snapchat and the potential for similar deals on other social media services.

“Because of the influence a Snapchat has, you can think through the who’s who of tech, and they are all paying attention,” said Greg Kirkorsky, an executive vice president at Chicago firm Stats.

Nearly four years ago, Snap became the first social media app to offer filters that stamp a photo or video with the time, temperatur­e or speed of travel. Since then, the Los Angeles company has added data options from providers including Weather Co., Factual, Stats, ScoreStrea­m and Uber.

Domenic Venuto, who oversees Weather Channel apps and Weather Co.’s consumer partnershi­ps, said he couldn’t resist the opportunit­y to connect with Snapchat’s young audience.

“Engagement is great,” said Venuto, who also has done deals with Google and Facebook.

Depending on location,

time and other factors, Snapchat users can decorate their images with multiday forecasts, expected arrival times during Uber trips and the score of a sports event they’re attending.

Speed and altitude geofilters are based on analysis of data from smartphone sensors.

During last year’s presidenti­al election, Snap pulled Associated Press data to show informatio­n about polling and other campaign-related informatio­n.

Snap says the deals make sense because such dynamic geofilters, as the company calls them, are more heavily used than more basic geofilters that change the background color or add a cutesy location tag.

The company contends that by providing timely geofilters, it creates a more personal experience for users. Those custom offerings get people more excited about expressing themselves through Snapchat, the thinking goes.

Dynamic geofilters are still overshadow­ed by basic geofilters, which often identify landmarks, towns and events. About 95 percent of those geofilters are created by users, compared with the autogenera­ted dynamic filters. More recently, Snapchat introduced bitmoji filters that change by the time of day and day of week.

But altogether, about 1.5 million geofilters are seen every minute on Snapchat, which represents double the number from the beginning of the year.

The 2-year-old deal with Stats took Snapchat filters to a new level, giving fans the ability to adorn photos with an up-to-the-minute virtual scoreboard.

Once shared with friends, the score on the photo remains static. First released for NBA and Major League Baseball games, scores were seen almost 400,000 times a game in the first week.

Stats’ Kirkorsky said Snapchat does have room to be an informatio­nal resource for sports, and he expects Snap to license scores for internatio­nal sports such as cricket.

“Partners like Snap would not continue to invest if they were not meeting objectives,” he said, predicting that Snap will open up access so that fans at the game aren’t the only ones who can add a virtual scoreboard.

“It’s cool they are putting publishing tools in the hands of consumers,” he said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States