San Francisco Chronicle

‘The outrage fades, the gun-industry contributi­ons flow, a nation sighs ...’

- — John Diaz, editorial page editor

Asked about gun laws, President Trump said Tuesday that “we’ll be talking about gun laws as time goes by.” It’s a maddeningl­y familiar refrain after each massacre. Politician­s who are beholden to the gun lobby jump to its talking points:

Now is not the time to make policy decisions.” Don’t politicize the tragedy.” “no Killers will find a way to get their lethal weaponry matter the law.”

It says something about the grip of the gun lobby on America’s elected representa­tives that a mass slaughter such as the one we saw in Las Vegas last weekend is met with resignatio­n instead of resolve.

None of them would dare say after a devastatin­g earthquake or dam breach: This is not the time to raise engineerin­g standards.

None of them would dare not ask after the fatal Ghost Ship fire: How many other warehouses are vulnerable?

None of them would dare say after millions of Americans lost their homes and savings through banks’ recklessne­ss: This is not the time to tighten regulation of the financial industry. OK, OK, more than a few politician­s, shamefully after the 2008 debacle, but that’s a story for another day. We do know this. None of them dared say after 9/11: Because we cannot anticipate every conceivabl­e mode of terrorist attack, this is not the time to take unpreceden­ted steps to make it more difficult for the evildoers. So emerged the Patriot Act, the extraordin­ary security measures at airports and the Department of Homeland Security. The wars in Afghanista­n and Iraq were rationaliz­ed as necessary in an all-out effort, direct and indirect, to counter the terrorist threat.

No such urgency has followed the mass shootings of Americans by Americans. In the lunacy of U.S. gun laws that are singularly promiscuou­s by the standards of industrial­ized nations, even suspected terrorists on the no-fly list are allowed to buy deadly firearms. Let that one sink in. Someone is considered too dangerous to board a plane, even after physical screening, yet is allowed to walk into a gun shop and buy weapons capable of inflicting mass carnage.

I’ve been writing and editing commentary on mass shootings for more than 20 years at this newspaper. While the magnitude of the massacres has only intensifie­d, Congress has passed only the most modest of gun-control measures, such as a 2008 law for better updating of records of people prohibited from buying weapons (such as those with documented mental health issues or certain criminal conviction­s). The National Rifle Associatio­n supported that bill, thank you very much, mostly out of its concern for people prevented from buying firearms because of outdated databases.

At least House Republican leaders had the decency after Las Vegas to delay a vote that would have loosened access to gun silencers. Also in the congressio­nal hopper is a measure that would allow people with concealed-weapon permits in their home states to carry a shrouded firearm in other states, even those with more restrictiv­e laws.

Meanwhile, significan­t public safety measures such as an assault weapons ban or the extension of background checks to gun shows and Internet sales continue to languish. And so it goes. The outrage fades, the gun-industry contributi­ons flow, a nation sighs (in relief or frustratio­n, depending on one’s interpreta­tion of the Second Amendment) until the next horrific event leads to a new round of declaratio­ns that this is no time to act.

Americans are asked to merely offer “thoughts and prayers” — and wait, yet again, for sign of a spine to form in Congress.

As time goes by.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States