San Francisco Chronicle

Treasury report seeks changes to financial rules

- By Tiffany Hsu Tiffany Hsu is a New York Times writer.

The Trump administra­tion is again taking aim at the Dodd-Frank Act, releasing a Treasury Department report last week that recommende­d a vast reworking of Wall Street rules adopted in response to the financial crisis.

Some of the proposed overhauls would do away with a requiremen­t for companies to divulge the pay ratio of chief executives to workers, streamline derivative­s rules, and give companies more access to capital and investors more places to put their money.

The ideas were welcomed on Wall Street, where banks complain that Dodd-Frank rules have needlessly hobbled growth. But they attracted skepticism from consumer groups and others, who consider the suggestion­s a dangerous relaxation of checks against a cavalier financial system.

The report offers a guide to agencies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which police activity relating to stocks, bonds and derivative­s. But the detailed 220-page document also serves as a gauge of the administra­tion’s attitude toward Wall Street — namely, that market restraints should be loosened.

The proposals follow a report on banking rules released by Treasury officials in June. That report sought to weaken the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, lighten regulatory scrutiny of small community banks and allow greater exemptions from the Volcker Rule, which bars banks from making speculativ­e bets for their own gain.

Both the June report and the one released Friday — as well as two more expected in the coming months — originated from an executive order that President Trump signed in February asking Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin to reposition financial rules to better match the administra­tion’s goals.

“The U.S. has experience­d slow economic growth for far too long,” Mnuchin said in a statement Friday. “By streamlini­ng the regulatory system, we can make the U.S. capital markets a true source of economic growth which will harness American ingenuity and allow small businesses to grow.”

Rob Nichols, chief executive of the American Bankers Associatio­n, called the Treasury recommenda­tions “practical, reasonable and achievable.”

“Many of the recommenda­tions in the report would make it easier to raise capital, meet the needs of bank customers operating domestical­ly and abroad, and focus regulatory processes on effective supervisio­n without harming the economy,” Nichols said in a statement.

Among its proposals, Treasury recommende­d increasing the amount that can be raised in a crowdfundi­ng offering to $5 million from $1 million. The department, which also said it hoped to encourage more companies to pursue initial public offerings, pointed out that the number of publicly traded companies had declined nearly 50 percent in the past two decades.

Treasury also addressed rules that require companies to disclose payments associated with foreign resource extraction and the presence of “conflict minerals” from war-racked regions in Africa in their products. It said the rules, which are backed by human rights groups, should be repealed or limited to large, mature companies.

The report touched on the costs of securities litigation, suggesting more research into arbitratio­n as a way for companies and shareholde­rs to resolve disputes. The document also asked for stronger regulation of the clearingho­uses that operate as middlemen between buyers and sellers on Wall Street.

Mike Calhoun, president of the Center for Responsibl­e Lending, said he was skeptical of claims that regulation­s stifle the economy, pointing to high profits and substantia­l share buybacks by banks as evidence that the institutio­ns are “awash in cash these days.”

The Treasury report is “more strategic” than other efforts to scale back oversight, but it is “still the wrong prescripti­on for expanding the economy, and a dangerous one,” he said.

The report said the SEC and the futures trading commission should be evaluated for any “regulatory overlaps and opportunit­ies for harmonizat­ion.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States