Ses­sions eyes Clin­ton Foun­da­tion in­ves­ti­ga­tion

San Francisco Chronicle Late Edition - - NATION - By Eric Tucker Eric Tucker is an Associated Press writer.

WASHINGTON — At­tor­ney Gen­eral Jeff Ses­sions is leav­ing open the pos­si­bil­ity that a spe­cial coun­sel could be ap­pointed to look into Clin­ton Foun­da­tion deal­ings and an Obama-era ura­nium deal, the Jus­tice De­part­ment said, in re­spond­ing to con­cerns from Repub­li­can law­mak­ers.

The de­part­ment said in a let­ter to the House Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee Mon­day that Ses­sions had di­rected se­nior fed­eral pros­e­cu­tors to “eval­u­ate cer­tain is­sues” raised in re­cent weeks by mem­bers of Congress, which in­clude al­le­ga­tions that the Clin­ton Foun­da­tion ben­e­fited from a years-old ura­nium trans­ac­tion in­volv­ing a Rus­sian-backed com­pany.

Pres­i­dent Trump him­self has re­peat­edly used so­cial me­dia to urge the Jus­tice De­part­ment to in­ves­ti­gate the deal, in­clud­ing in a se­ries of Twit­ter posts this month in which he lamented not hav­ing more di­rect in­flu­ence over the af­fairs of the law en­force­ment agency.

The pros­e­cu­tors will re­port to Ses­sions and Deputy At­tor­ney Gen­eral Rod Rosen­stein and rec­om­mend whether any new in­ves­ti­ga­tions should be opened, whether any mat­ters cur­rently un­der in­ves­ti­ga­tion re­quire ad­di­tional re­sources and whether it might be nec­es­sary to ap­point a spe­cial coun­sel to over­see a probe.

Any ap­point­ment of a new spe­cial coun­sel, par­tic­u­larly in re­sponse to calls from mem­bers of Congress or from Trump him­self, is likely to lead to crit­i­cism com­plaints about an un­due po­lit­i­cal in­flu­ence on a de­part­ment that is meant to func­tion out­side of any par­ti­san sway or de­mand.

Though the Jus­tice De­part­ment falls within the ex­ec­u­tive branch, and its pri­or­i­ties are his­tor­i­cally in line with those of the pres­i­dent, the White House is not sup­posed to in­flu­ence the de­ci­sions of pros­e­cu­tors on any par­tic­u­lar cases.

The Jus­tice De­part­ment sought to ad­dress those con­cerns in its let­ter, with As­sis­tant At­tor­ney Gen­eral Stephen Boyd say­ing that the de­part­ment “will never eval­u­ate any mat­ter ex­cept on the facts and the law.”

Nonethe­less, the ac­tion fol­lows a se­ries of crit­i­cal pub­lic state­ments by Trump that ob­servers said blurred the line be­tween the White House and the Jus­tice De­part­ment.

In re­cent weeks, he has re­peat­edly weighed in on Twit­ter on Jus­tice De­part­ment busi­ness to call for in­ves­ti­ga­tions of Democrats and has chal­lenged Ses­sions to be more ag­gres­sive in go­ing af­ter his po­lit­i­cal op­po­nents, ex­press­ing par­tic­u­lar sup­port for in­ves­ti­gat­ing the Clin­ton Foun­da­tion.

“Ev­ery­body is ask­ing why the Jus­tice De­part­ment (and FBI) isn’t look­ing into all of the dis­hon­esty go­ing on with Crooked Hil­lary & the Dems...” Trump tweeted ear­lier this month.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA

© PressReader. All rights reserved.