San Francisco Chronicle

Learn to value beak-to-tail cuisine

- By Michael Carolan Savored in Samoa Embracing the whole animal Michael Carolan is a professor of sociolog y and the associate dean of research for the College of Liberal Arts at Colorado State University in Fort Collins, Colo. To comment, submit your lett

When I asked one poultry producer recently to name something his industry thinks about that consumers don’t, he replied, “Beaks and butts.” This was his shorthand for animal parts that consumers — especially in wealthy nations — don’t choose to eat.

On Thanksgivi­ng, turkeys will adorn close to 90 percent of U.S. dinner tables. But one part of the bird never makes it to the groaning board, or even to the giblet bag: the tail. The fate of this fatty chunk of meat shows us the bizarre inner workings of our global food system, where eating more of one food produces less-desirable cuts and parts. This then creates demand elsewhere — so successful­ly in some instances that the foreign part becomes, over time, a national delicacy.

Rather than letting turkey tails go to waste, the poultry industry saw a business opportunit­y. The target: Pacific Island communitie­s, where animal protein was scarce. In the 1950s, U.S. poultry firms began dumping turkey tails, along with chicken backs, into markets in Samoa. With this strategy, the turkey industry turned waste into gold.

By 2007, the average Samoan was consuming more than 44 pounds of turkey tails every year — a food that had been unknown there less than a century earlier. That’s nearly triple Americans’ annual per capita turkey consumptio­n.

When I interviewe­d Samoans for my book “No One Eats Alone: Food as a Social Enterprise,” it was immediatel­y clear that some considered this once-foreign food part of their island’s national cuisine. When I asked them to list popular “Samoan foods,” multiple people mentioned turkey tails — frequently washed down with a cold Budweiser.

How did imported turkey tails become a favorite among Samoa’s working class? Here lies a lesson for health educators: The tastes of iconic foods cannot be separated from the environmen­ts in which they are eaten. The more convivial the atmosphere, the more likely people will be to have positive associatio­ns with the food.

Food companies have known this for generation­s. It’s why Coca-Cola has been ubiquitous in baseball parks for more than a century, and why many McDonald’s have PlayPlaces. It also explains our attachment to turkey and other classics at Thanksgivi­ng. The holidays can be stressful, but they also are a lot of fun.

As Julia, a Samoan in her 20s, explained to me, “You have to understand that we eat turkey tails at home with family. It’s a social food, not something you’ll eat when you’re alone.”

Turkey tails also come up in discussion­s of the health epidemic gripping these islands. American Samoa has an obesity rate of 75 percent. Samoan officials grew so concerned that they banned turkey tail imports in 2007.

But asking Samoans to abandon this cherished food overlooked its deep social attachment­s. Moreover, under World Trade Organizati­on rules, countries and territorie­s generally cannot unilateral­ly ban the import of commoditie­s unless there are proven public health reasons for doing so. Samoa was forced to lift its ban in 2013 as a condition of joining the WTO, notwithsta­nding its health worries.

If Americans were more interested in eating turkey tails, some of our supply might stay at home. Can we bring back so called nose-to-tail animal consumptio­n?

Beyond Americans’ general squeamishn­ess toward offal and tails, we have a knowledge problem. Who even knows how to carve a turkey anymore? Challengin­g diners to select, prepare and eat whole animals is a pretty big ask.

Google’s digitizati­on of old cookbooks shows us that it wasn’t always so. “The American Home Cook Book,” published in 1864, instructs readers when choosing lamb to “observe the neck vein in the fore quarter, which should be of an azure-blue to denote quality and sweetness.” Or when selecting venison, “pass a knife along the bones of the haunches of the shoulders; if it smell [sic] sweet, the meat is new and good; if tainted, the fleshy parts of the side will look discolored, and the darker in proportion to its staleness.” Clearly, our ancestors knew food very differentl­y than we do today.

It is not that we don’t know how to judge quality anymore. But the yardstick we use is calibrated — intentiona­lly, as I’ve learned — against a different standard. The modern industrial food system has trained consumers to prioritize quantity and convenienc­e, and to judge freshness on sell-bydate stickers.

If this picture is bothersome, then think about taking steps to recalibrat­e that yardstick. Maybe add a few heirloom ingredient­s to beloved holiday dishes and talk about what makes them special, perhaps while showing the kids how to judge a fruit or vegetable’s ripeness. Or even roast some turkey tails.

 ?? Tetra Images / Getty Images/Tetra images RF ?? Eating the whole turkey may be the ethical choice — plus a chance to enjoy some surprising­ly good tastes.
Tetra Images / Getty Images/Tetra images RF Eating the whole turkey may be the ethical choice — plus a chance to enjoy some surprising­ly good tastes.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States