San Francisco Chronicle

Trump made a lot of sense discussing guns

- Email: ruben@rubennavar­rette.com. His daily podcast, “Navarrette Nation,” is available through every podcast app.

I’m not used to defending President Trump, and I’m even more unaccustom­ed to feeling sorry for him. Now I’m doing both because of the raw deal that he got after a recent televised meeting on gun policy with lawmakers from both parties.

When Trump gets something wrong, the media and the special interests are quick to pounce. They ought to be just as good at acknowledg­ing when he does something right.

First, Trump deserves praise — especially from the news media — for opening up the process and changing how politics is covered. He occasional­ly invites television cameras into what were once closeddoor meetings. It used to be that the president and lawmakers could say whatever they wanted in private with no way to hold them accountabl­e. Then, later, they could say something different to the media. But when the proceeding­s are televised, everyone is on notice that what they say matters.

Next, Trump should get credit for doing something that you rarely see any Republican do at either end of Pennsylvan­ia Avenue: challengin­g the National Rifle Associatio­n. The president noted that the NRA has a headlock on Congress but insisted that the organizati­on will go along with reasonable reforms. If not, he said, he’s ready to fight them.

Trump is due another round of applause for the fact that — during the meeting itself — he exhibited calm leadership, mature restraint and shrewd negotiatin­g skills.

Unlike the adolescent who doesn’t seem to think before he tweets, the person who chaired the discussion on guns sounded like a grown-up. He also sounded like the father of an 11-yearold boy who plays video games, including some that Trump acknowledg­es are extremely violent. The president thinks we should look at the effect that such games might be having on young people.

Trump also refused to go along with highly controvers­ial reforms like outlawing assault weapons or requiring all states to honor concealed carry permits. He understand­s that — while he can signal what reforms he would support — it’s the job of the legislativ­e branch to draft a bill. Besides, he knows what items would be deal killers for each side, and he cautioned the lawmakers not to include them because they could derail the whole process.

As for Trump’s own view on guns, he displayed a lot of common sense when he asked how it is that people have to wait until they turn 21 to legally purchase a handgun, but can buy a rifle at 18. This includes the high-powered, semiautoma­tic AR-15 that is increasing­ly the gun of choice for mass killings.

Gun proponents argue that young people who are 18 to 21 may like to hunt, and they have the right to do so.

But while the Second Amendment protects the right to bear arms, it doesn’t say anything about purchasing them. Someone may have to do that for you. In fact, when I was 16, I had a small-caliber hunting rifle because my dad bought me one. And if you haven’t yet reached a certain age, your parent or guardian is free to buy you a gun if they think you’re responsibl­e enough to handle one.

Finally, while it angered many conservati­ves, Trump may well have the law on his side when he talked about getting around due process and finding a way to allow family members to immediatel­y take guns out of the hands of dangerous people and then go to court to petition for the right to seize them.

There is a public-safety exception to constituti­onal requiremen­ts of due process when going through the normal procedure could put people’s lives in danger. So noted the Supreme Court in a 1984 case called New York vs. Quarles, which recognized that a police officer could be exempt from reading a suspect his Miranda rights — consistent with the Fifth Amendment — if there was an emergency. In the Quarles case, the officer had to find a loaded handgun in a public place.

All in all, Trump performed quite well in the televised meeting over guns. So well that the liberal news media is now desperatel­y putting out another narrative suggesting that the president has backed off much of what he said at that discussion, under pressure from the NRA. The organizati­on said as much to its members, but the White House denies that it has reversed course.

With all the spin and competing agendas, it’s hard to know what to believe. Ultimately, results are what matter. Let’s see some.

 ?? Tom Brenner / New York Times ?? President Trump deserves credit for standing up to the National Rifle Associatio­n.
Tom Brenner / New York Times President Trump deserves credit for standing up to the National Rifle Associatio­n.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States