San Francisco Chronicle

Nowhere to hide from horror cliches

- By Peter Hartlaub Peter Hartlaub is The San Francisco Chronicle’s pop culture critic. Email: phartlaub@ sfchronicl­e.com Twitter: @PeterHartl­aub

“The Strangers: Prey at Night” is a nihilistic slasher movie, and a subtle criticism of society’s destabiliz­ing family unit. But mostly it serves as a comprehens­ive manual of bad places to hide from a masked killer.

Forget escaping in the working automobile outside. Why not retreat to that drainage pipe with only one entrance, behind that see-through lattice fence, or in the trailer park bathroom with no windows? A guy is chasing you with an ax? Just jump in the swimming pool! No way he’ll follow you in there …

The first “Strangers” was an effective, if thoroughly depressing, exercise in horror. The couple being stalked by a freaky trio of murderers seemed completely undeservin­g, making their victimizat­ion seem random, and thus more relatable to the audience. In the sequel, the family of four is so inept and unsympathe­tic that it’s hard not to root for the killers. Somebody stop this quartet of numbskulls before they pass their lack of selfpreser­vation down to another generation!

“Prey at Night” begins with two parents (Christina Hendricks and Martin Henderson), driving their wayward teen daughter (Bailee Madison) to a boarding school, as an older teen son (Lewis Pullman) tags along. All seem to be, to varying degrees, jerks with severe communicat­ion problems. They stop at an all-but-abandoned backwoods resort where the killers have already arrived.

By the time the hooded man and two doll-faced women close in on the foursome, the victims are so insufferab­le that a trimming of the herd seems like a welcome relief. The action ramps up toward the end, followed by some supernatur­al aspects that subvert the foundation of realism that made the first film so frightenin­g and memorable.

New director Johannes Roberts has a nice sense of timing, using shadows and sound to heighten what are mostly straightfo­rward jump scares. The killers, with their smileyface­d masks, unnerving lack of a conscience, and unexplaine­d preference for 1980s music when they start stabbing people, are sufficient­ly creepy.

But this “Strangers” sequel seems outright lazy when compared to superior horror movies such as “Get Out” or “It Follows,” where every decision by the victims makes sense by the screenwrit­er-establishe­d rules. The actions of the family in “Prey at Night” rarely acknowledg­e logic, and often seem to be deliberate­ly mocking common sense. The audience at the critics screening I attended was literally shouting instructio­ns at the screen (“Shoot her! Just shoot her!”), before giving up in frustratio­n.

The constant darkness also becomes a liability. The woodsy setting is unrelentin­gly dim, to the point where the sense of geography is often lost. If there’s a third movie in the series, we vote for “The Strangers: Prey in Broad Daylight.”

After mostly bad news for our dumb heroes, there are a few crowd-pleasing moments of violent action in the third act. But even those feel like a cheat, contradict­ing the tone of the last movie and the first half of this one. For a movie that seems to aspire to some deeper thought, the writers have underestim­ated the intelligen­ce of their audience.

 ?? Brian Dogulas / Aviron Pictures ?? Mysterious figures stalk a family that’s hard to feel sorry for.
Brian Dogulas / Aviron Pictures Mysterious figures stalk a family that’s hard to feel sorry for.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States