San Francisco Chronicle

Lawyers differ on what gunman’s widow knew

- By Tamara Lush Tamara Lush is an Associated Press writer.

ORLANDO, Fla. — If jurors in a federal trial in Florida believe government prosecutor­s, the wife of the man who carried out one of the U.S.’s biggest mass shootings gave a “green light” to her husband when he wanted to execute his terrorist-inspired attack.

But if they accept Noor Salman’s attorney’s account that she was a “devoted mother” with an IQ of 84 and was the victim of Omar Mateen’s repeated lies throughout their marriage, they could decide she had no prior knowledge of the attack.

Salman went on trial Wednesday in Orlando. The 31-year-old is accused of aiding and abetting her husband in his attack on the Pulse nightclub in June of 2016. She’s also charged with obstructio­n of justice. If convicted, she faces life in prison.

After opening statements, the government called a variety of witnesses who gave emotional testimony about that night at Pulse. Two police officers testified, as did a survivor who said she covered herself with a dead body while Mateen shot his way through the club. Prosecutor­s also showed video taken inside the club by one survivor; Salman covered her eyes with her hand and victims’ family members in the court teared up.

Prosecutor­s portrayed a woman who knew Mateen was buying rounds of ammunition for his AR-15, helped him spend thousands of dollars before the attack and knew about his plan when he left the house in the hours before the shooting. They also say she lied, tried to mislead FBI agents and had knowledge of her husband’s sick fascinatio­n with violent jihadist videos and terrorism.

“None of the victims that night knew the horrific events that would unfold. No one knew except for two people: Omar Mateen and his wife,” Assistant U.S. Attorney James Mandolfo said. “The defendant gave Omar Mateen the green light to commit terrorism on behalf of ISIS.”

In his hour-long opening statement, Mandolfo gave several examples of Salman’s conflictin­g statements to FBI agents in the hours after the attack. In one conversati­on with authoritie­s, before they informed her of any details of the attack, she said, “My husband is safe with guns.”

Said Mandolfo: “No one ever told her about guns.”

He described a wife who knowingly went to at least two locations with Mateen to “scout” sites of potential terrorist attacks. One was City Place, an open-air shopping center in West Palm Beach. The other was Disney Springs, a crowded dining and shopping area near the famed theme parks, Mandolfo said.

The statements she made to the FBI after the attack will be key to the trial.

Salman’s attorney, Linda Moreno, argued in opening statements that some of the claims are contradict­ed by cell phone records and other evidence.

“She cooperated with the FBI completely,” said Moreno, adding that her client never asked for a lawyer and consented to a home search. The FBI in their hours-long questionin­g manipulate­d and coerced her, Moreno asserts.

“Noor Salman denied any knowledge of Omar Mateen’s plans for hours,” she said, adding that agents told Salman that she could go to jail and not see her child.

Salman was arrested in 2017 at her mother’s California home in Rodeo, where she and her 4-yearold son were staying.

 ?? Red Huber / Associated Press ?? Members of a civil liberties group gather outside the courthouse where Noor Salman is on trial.
Red Huber / Associated Press Members of a civil liberties group gather outside the courthouse where Noor Salman is on trial.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States