San Francisco Chronicle

Vote to give S.F. police Tasers

- By Martin Halloran Martin Halloran, a sergeant in the San Francisco Police Department, is president of the San Francisco Police Officers Associatio­n.

For 29 years, I have sworn an oath to protect and serve the people of San Francisco. Over the course of my career many things have changed, but police officers’ commitment to the people of this city has never wavered. Beyond keeping the peace, we are often called upon to play the role of first responders, frontline social workers, counselors and protectors. We need every tool at our disposal to control potentiall­y dangerous confrontat­ions without them resulting in injury or death.

San Francisco is one of the few major cities in the United States that has not equipped its police officers with conducted energy devices, of which the most commonly used type is a Taser, despite a 2016 recommenda­tion from President Barack Obama’s U.S. Department of Justice encouragin­g the city to “strongly consider deploying” Tasers. In November 2017, the San Francisco Police Commission approved the potential use and adoption of Tasers, but it failed to approve any specific policy and delayed implementa­tion of their use indefinite­ly. The commission voted 6-1 to adopt a policy drafted by the San Francisco Police Department on Wednesday night.

For 13 years, through vigorous debate, multiple hearings and drafts of policies, and with the support of four separate police chiefs, we at the San Francisco Police Officers Associatio­n asked the commission to equip officers with tools to more effectivel­y do our job. Our requests were repeatedly ignored.

For our community and our neighborho­od police, this was too slow and too uncertain of an outcome. Our department needs a comprehens­ive Taser policy, and we are asking the public for your help. That is why the POA is putting this matter before San Francisco voters this June as Propositio­n H.

Should the voters pass Prop. H, it will still need commission approval in terms of formulatin­g a general order on the policy. Now that the Police Commission has passed a policy, the city must confer with the POA before it goes before the commission for final approval. Our belief is the POA and the commission should work in tandem to develop a policy that benefits the department, our citizens and our officers.

We have researched national best practices to craft a policy that will save lives. Prop. H will ensure officers complete annual training requiremen­ts to de-escalate violent situations. It will also require reporting and a department accountabi­lity review for any occurrence of Taser discharge. Finally, Prop. H mandates automated external defibrilla­tors be available in SFPD vehicles in all districts where Tasers are deployed.

The adoption of Tasers has been proved to reduce the rate of injury across the board, and the National Institute of Justice reported that, in some police department­s, the use of a Taser reduced the rate of injury to suspects by as much as 70 percent.

Issuing Tasers to police officers will save lives by reducing officer-involved shootings. Police officers should not be forced to use guns in dangerous situations because they lack an effective, less-than-lethal option. This is why Tasers are used by police department­s in nearly every major U.S. city. Yet in San Francisco, politics too often get in the way of practical solutions. Prop. H takes the politics out of our neighborho­od safety.

San Francisco’s officers need every tool available to them to keep the peace. We have had no intermedia­ry means of force in between a baton and a firearm to defuse potentiall­y dangerous situations. Tasers are a proven less-lethal option that can keep both our residents and officers safe by decreasing the number of officer-involved shootings and injury across the city.

The POA has been working diligently and has attended every single stakeholde­r meeting, and it will continue to be engaged with the commission and the Police Department on the other 272 Department of Justice recommenda­tions.

No officer ever wants to discharge their firearm, but our job brings with it great risk. Now is the time to implement a policy that data has proven will save lives, reduce injury and give our officers a tool that can de-escalate a crisis situation without the use of lethal force.

Please join us this June in keeping our neighborho­ods safe by voting Yes on H.

 ?? Matthew Brown / Hearst Connecticu­t Media 2016 ?? Use of Tasers, such as this model X26, have been an issue in San Francisco for 13 years.
Matthew Brown / Hearst Connecticu­t Media 2016 Use of Tasers, such as this model X26, have been an issue in San Francisco for 13 years.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States