San Francisco Chronicle

Feds get in way of reform effort

-

The Trump administra­tion has largely abandoned providing assistance to reform-seeking, local law enforcemen­t agencies across the country, and the change has hurt cities like San Francisco. That was the crucial message coming out of a three-day conference last week hosted by the National Organizati­on of Black Law Enforcemen­t Executives.

Northern California police chiefs, commanders, prosecutor­s and community activists gathered in Oakland last week to discuss police shootings, racial bias and other crucial and contentiou­s issues in law enforcemen­t.

One theme that kept emerging was the progress that had begun on local police reform under the Obama-era Department of Justice — and the difficulty of continuing that progress under the Trump administra­tion. A case in point is San Francisco. Following a string of controvers­ial police shootings, San Francisco leaders requested a Department of Justice review of the Police Department’s practices in April 2016. The Department of Justice responded with 272 recommenda­tions — and, crucially, with the promise of support as San Francisco police implemente­d them.

The Police Department was in the middle of implementi­ng the recommenda­tions when U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions abruptly lurched his Department of Justice in a different direction.

Under Sessions, Justice has pulled resources out of collaborat­ive reform programs, essentiall­y telling local law enforcemen­t agencies that they’re on their own.

Sessions’ decision undercuts San Francisco police — and other local law enforcemen­t agencies that were depending on Justice Department support for reforms — in at least two ways.

One, by ripping resources away from police agencies attempting to reform their practices, the Justice Department is suggesting that it’s not invested in their success.

Two, by refusing to provide independen­t guidance and support for local police agencies, the federal government is sending a message that reforms don’t matter.

Both of these messages are an insult to the men and women who work in law enforcemen­t. The choice will have poor practical impacts, as well: communitie­s that have agitated for reforms will be frustrated when those reforms are slowed, or even stopped.

The San Francisco Police Department asked California’s attorney general, Xavier Becerra, to step in, and Becerra has agreed to do so.

The decision ensures that our Police Department will continue making reforms, though at a slower pace. (Becerra’s office is new to the role, and city and state officials are still working out the specifics.)

But even with the delays, San Francisco is in a fortunate position. The city’s police leadership is invested in making necessary changes, and the leadership of this state is invested in police reform. Both of those elements are critical, because police reforms are difficult to implement and even harder to maintain.

Other cities aren’t so lucky. That’s the real tragedy of this federal pullback: Reform-minded communitie­s will see their efforts thwarted by those who should have protected them.

 ?? Paul Chinn / The Chronicle ?? Oakland Police Chief Anne Kirkpatric­k and San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott discuss reforms.
Paul Chinn / The Chronicle Oakland Police Chief Anne Kirkpatric­k and San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott discuss reforms.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States