San Francisco Chronicle

More time to enjoy Twin Peaks view

Extension of traffic closure a boon for joggers, cyclists

- By Michael Cabanatuan

With sweeping vistas that give visitors a surreal feeling of staring down at a living postcard, Twin Peaks ranks high on San Francisco’s must-see list for tourists and locals alike. For decades, a drive to Twin Peaks and around its namesake hills with a stop at the viewing area at Christmas Tree Point was a must-do.

So when the Municipal Transporta­tion Agency decided in 2016 to chop the graceful figure-eight Twin Peaks Boulevard in two and close the eastern half — the side with the best view — to cars and buses, an outcry ensued over traffic safety and the sense of changing a San Francisco icon.

The agency intended it as an experiment to make it safer for walkers, joggers and bicyclists by giving them a place free of the cars and tour buses that regularly make their way up Twin Peaks, and to create a more parklike experience.

Now, two years later, the MTA and the Recreation and Park Department, with contributi­ons from many Twin Peaks visitors, have deemed the test a success, and plan to make it permanent — and the area prettier. On Tuesday, the MTA Board of Directors approved a two-year extension of the experiment to give the city time to devise a permanent design.

The decision came after more than 58 percent of 438 people who replied to an online survey, MTA officials said, favored making the project permanent, including 71 percent of people walking and 73 percent of bicyclists. Drivers are

traveling at safer speeds, with those exceeding 30 mph down by 77 percent, officials said.

“I remember people predicted chaos, destructio­n, vehicles crashing into trees,” said Sasha McGee, a San Francisco resident who often visits Twin Peaks. “Obviously that hasn’t happened.”

Not everyone supports the changes, though. The Twin Peaks Improvemen­t Associatio­n, whose members live in the neighborho­ods below the landmark, fought the plans in 2016 and still oppose them.

Before the reconfigur­ation, motorized traffic flowed mostly one-way atop Twin Peaks on roads with no sidewalks or bike lanes. But in 2016, driven in part by a crash in December 2012 that killed a 56-yearold tourist as she walked along the road, the MTA banned motor vehicles from the east side. Cars, trucks and buses were redirected to the west side, where they now travel in both directions with a single lane each way.

Dona Crowder, the associatio­n president, said the old configurat­ion seemed safer because traffic on both sides of the peaks made it more likely criminals would be deterred by the possibilit­y of being seen by a larger number of people and because it allowed drivers to see the view without having to park and walk away from their cars, exposing them to thieves.

“It’s forcing people to get out of their cars and walk around for the views, which we think is a security issue for their person, and also their car,” she said.

San Francisco police say, however, the new configurat­ion makes it easier for them to patrol the area, particular­ly the Christmas Tree Point parking area.

For many visitors, the desire to drive around the peaks seems to have been supplanted by an appreciati­on of a peaceful place to enjoy the view without having to watch out for cars.

“This is really nice,” said Mona Small, 65, a retiree from Philadelph­ia in town with her husband, Bob, to visit grandchild­ren. “It’s always nicer to walk where you don’t have to worry about getting hit.”

While the view atop Twin Peaks and the surroundin­gs is beautiful, the former roadway now dedicated to pedestrian­s and bicyclists is rather spartan, devoid of benches, tables or landscapin­g. MTA officials used thigh-high portable concrete barriers, paint and signs in 2016 to turn the figure eight into a pair of figure threes. The lone physical improvemen­t was the removal of the yellow stripe dividing the lanes of the section of road now dedicated to people on foot or bike.

During the two-year extension of the Twin Peaks test, Recreation and Park planners will hold community meetings, design proposed improvemen­ts, conduct environmen­tal studies and find money to pay for it all. The MTA will need to approve the road changes again in 2020 to make them permanent.

Atop Twin Peaks on Wednesday, just after the clouds cleared, most visitors liked the idea.

Melanie Raines, 35, a restaurant worker who lives in Noe Valley, runs up Twin Peaks and along the closed stretch of road every couple of weeks.

“I don’t have to worry about cars or about people. Most of them are tourists who don’t know where they’re going,” she said. “That’s great.”

Some weren’t so sure about the plan.

Serf Rodriquez, 68, a postal worker, grew up in San Francisco and attended Mission High before moving to Seattle decades ago. He said he misses driving along the east side and seeing the view.

“This used to be our old make-out spot,” he said, as his wife, Maggie Rodriguez, 68, a quality-control worker, shook her head. “Sometimes change is for the best, and sometimes it’s not.”

“It’s always nicer to walk where you don’t have to worry about getting hit.” Mona Small, tourist visiting Twin Peaks from Philadelph­ia

 ?? Lea Suzuki / The Chronicle ?? Serf Rodriquez (left) and Maggie Rodriguez of Seattle take in the view from atop Twin Peaks while enjoying a walk along the portion of the figure-eight road that will remain closed to motorized vehicles.
Lea Suzuki / The Chronicle Serf Rodriquez (left) and Maggie Rodriguez of Seattle take in the view from atop Twin Peaks while enjoying a walk along the portion of the figure-eight road that will remain closed to motorized vehicles.
 ?? Lea Suzuki / The Chronicle ?? Bob and Mona Small of Philadelph­ia enjoy the view from the part of Twin Peaks Boulevard the Municipal Transporta­tion Agency wants to limit to cyclists and pedestrian­s permanentl­y.
Lea Suzuki / The Chronicle Bob and Mona Small of Philadelph­ia enjoy the view from the part of Twin Peaks Boulevard the Municipal Transporta­tion Agency wants to limit to cyclists and pedestrian­s permanentl­y.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States