San Francisco Chronicle

Navy agrees: Retesting is needed

Public asked to comment on how process proceeds

- By Kimberly Ostrowski Kimberly Ostrowski is director of the Navy Base Realignmen­t and Closure (BRAC), West.

The former Hunters Point Naval Shipyard is an important part of the city of San Francisco, having played a vital national defense role during World War II and afterward. Today, the priority for the site reflects that space to live and work in the city is both scarce and expensive.

That is where the Navy Base Realignmen­t and Closure (BRAC) process comes in. Since 1990, it has transferre­d and repurposed dozens of closed U.S. military installati­ons for commercial and public use. The Shipyard project will follow in these footsteps.

Since entering the BRAC program in 1991, the vast majority of shipyard project cleanup work has been successful­ly completed. Over the past several years, however, there has been radiologic­al assessment work at the site that does not measure up.

Radiologic­al cleanup at the shipyard project is challengin­g under any circumstan­ces, due to low levels of radiation that are near the “background levels” naturally occurring in the environmen­t. Adding to that challenge is that the radiologic­al analysis and cleanup work performed by a Navy contractor is in question.

The Navy originally discovered irregulari­ties in the radiologic­al data provided by Tetra Tech EC through its ongoing internal quality control procedures in 2012. The Navy worked with Tetra Tech EC and regulatory agencies to address those issues and others from 2012 to 2016.

Subsequent­ly, the Navy identified additional problems with Tetra Tech EC. Then-former Tetra Tech EC employees came forward with specific claims of deliberate falsificat­ion of tests, improper work and fraudulent record keeping. In 2016, the Navy paused the radiologic­al program at the shipyard developmen­t for a comprehens­ive review. And while there have been multiple reports, articles and much speculatio­n since, it is important that the community understand­s three things.

1) The shipyard project and nearby areas are safe. The levels of radiation there are low; exposure to these levels would not result in an immediate risk to human health or the environmen­t. In addition, the radiologic­al remedial work performed there has proper controls in place to ensure that workers and the public remain safe.

Regulators have repeatedly verified the safety of Parcel A, which was investigat­ed, cleared and removed from the Superfund program in 1999. The Environmen­tal Protection Agency surveyed Parcel A before transfer to the city in 2004. The Navy also supports the California Department of Public Health’s decision to scan areas of Parcel A to provide residents with additional peace of mind.

2) The Navy understand­s the concerns raised by local stakeholde­rs. Credible, reliable data is crucial to establish the property readiness for transfer and use by the local community. That is why the Navy stopped all remaining transfers of property at the shipyard developmen­t. The city and developers have also agreed to pause work on parcels UC1, UC2 and D2, which were transferre­d to the city in 2015.

3) The Navy agrees with community leaders and its regulatory partners that all of Tetra Tech EC radiologic­al work areas must be re-evaluated. Last week, the Navy released its proposed work plan for retesting Parcel G, identified by the city as its top-priority parcel for developmen­t. Once final, this work plan will serve as a model for other parcel work plans that follow.

To ensure that retesting is performed properly, the Navy has hired independen­t contractor­s to oversee the work and verify testing results. The EPA and the California Department of Public Health also will conduct independen­t sampling to confirm results.

The public has until Aug. 14 to offer suggestion­s on the approach the Navy will use to retest Parcel G. This doubles the typical 30-day comment period in order to give stakeholde­rs additional time to review and provide feedback. The work plan, a fact sheet and an explanatio­n of the comment process are all available to the public at bracpmo.navy.mil/hpnsrc. Community members are encouraged to participat­e.

It’s time to get the radiologic­al cleanup work at Hunters Point back on track. Retesting at Parcel G is the start. The shipyard project has a long history of proud service to the country, and an important future ahead to the city of San Francisco and its residents. The Navy is determined that our legacy here will be positive and that we will be here until the work is done.

 ?? Photos by Noah Berger / Special to The Chronicle ?? Parcel G, identified as the top priority for developmen­t, is seen behind cranes at the former Hunters Point Naval Shipyard.
Photos by Noah Berger / Special to The Chronicle Parcel G, identified as the top priority for developmen­t, is seen behind cranes at the former Hunters Point Naval Shipyard.
 ??  ?? The work plan for Parcel G will serve as a model for other parcel plans that follow at the San Francisco site.
The work plan for Parcel G will serve as a model for other parcel plans that follow at the San Francisco site.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States