San Francisco Chronicle

2019 Jeep Cherokee V-6 AWD: An undistinct­ive SUV loses its most distinctiv­e feature

- By Alexander Stoklosa

When Jeep resurrecte­d the Cherokee name for 2014, it did so with a compact crossover with a surfeit of front-end lighting. Of the trio of lamps per side, it wasn’t immediatel­y clear which was the headlight, which was a fog light, and which was there just because. Whatever your feelings on the arachnid-like face, it was distinctiv­e.

For even deeper coverage of the Cherokee, view our Buyer’s Guide in-depth review.

The refreshed 2019 Cherokee is less so. Every Cherokee has lost its belighted front styling, so you’ll no longer be confused by which light does what. There are now two prominent, obvious headlights that flank Jeep’s signature seven-slat grille. Beneath those are smaller fog lights. Simple. In back, the Cherokee’s taillights feature new internals, and the license-plate nacelle has moved from the lower bumper to the center of the liftgate.

» 2019 Jeep Cherokee V-6 AWD Price as tested: $41,510 (base price: $28,685) Zero to 60 mph: 7.2 sec Top speed (governor limited): 118 mph EPA fuel economy: Combined/city/highway: 22/19/27 mpg

HMM ...

Having swung the Cherokee’s aesthetic pendulum from overly interestin­g to somewhat boring, Jeep’s stylists-it could be saidbrough­t the SUV’s outward appearance in line with its indistinct personalit­y. Excepting the offroad-oriented Trailhawk trim level, whose capability is peerless in this class, the Cherokee remains a merely average crossover.

Among the Cherokee’s biggest changes outside of its resting bored face is a new, rangetoppi­ng 270-hp turbocharg­ed 2.0-liter inline-four engine option. That new powertrain, which includes a nine-speed automatic transmissi­on, was not fitted to our test car. Instead, our Cherokee came with the same 3.2-liter V-6 that has been offered as an option since this generation of Cherokee debuted. (A 180-hp 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine is standard and now benefits from an automatic engine stop/start function.) The V-6 holds just a 1-hp advantage over the new turbo four and is down 56 lb-ft of torque to the boosted mill.

That power disparity-not to mention the V-6’s EPA-estimated fuel economy that lags behind that of the two available fourcylind­er engines-explains why the V-6 is no longer the Cherokee’s premier powerplant. The V-6 is a $1745 upcharge on every trim level save for the Trailhawk and the Overland reviewed here, where it’s stan-

dard equipment. Jeep charges $2245 for the new turbo four on every trim except for the base Latitude (where it isn’t available) and lowers its ask to $500 on the Trailhawk and the Overland.

Anything beyond a hamster spinning a wheel is better than the Cherokee’s base 2.4-liter engine, which casts the V-6 in a relatively favorable light. The six is smooth and ladles its power to the wheels in a linear fashion, even sprinkling in a nice throaty exhaust ripple as the revs rise. Plus, a V-6 is a rapidly disappeari­ng engine type among the Cherokee’s competitiv­e set.

LOST IN TRANSMISSI­ON

Too bad the pleasant-mannered V-6 is dulled by the Cherokee’s substantia­l curb weight and ZF’s still-not-great nine-speed automatic transmissi­on. Not only did our loaded Cherokee Overland’s 4250-pound curb weight dull its zero-to-60-mph accelerati­on to a so-so 7.2 seconds (roughly on par with non-turbocharg­ed four-cylinder competitor­s), it posted just 19 mpg overall during our time with it. That figure matches the EPA’s city fuel-economy estimate for this Cherokee powertrain, while the 25 mpg we recorded on our 75-mph real-world highway fuel-economy test loop falls 2 mpg short of the EPA’s highway estimate.

Although Chrysler claims to have fixed the nine-speed transmissi­on’s biggest bugaboo-its seeming allergy to its ninth gear in normal use-reaching that top gear still seems dependent on the alignment of celestial bodies, a prayer uttered beneath one’s breath, or a good long downhill stretch of road. We suppose it’s for the best, since the transmissi­on is highly reluctant to downshift. By steadfastl­y trying to stay in too tall a gear most of the time, the transmissi­on ties blocks of concrete around the Cherokee’s ankles. Requests for small increases in throttle to maintain speed or accelerate gently simply go unanswered; if you’re on level ground, that means a big gaspedal stomp is necessary to kick down several gears and accelerate with haste. Should you find yourself climbing a mild grade, the Jeep will slowly lose speed until you give it the boot. The problems don’t end when you come to a stop, either; accelerati­ng from rest, the transmissi­on stumbles trying to pick between first and second gear.

CROSSING NO NEW GROUND

If the Cherokee has an area of expertise, it’s feeling bigger than it is, similar to the GMC Terrain / Chevrolet Equinox twins. This is a selling point, not a demerit, for the Cherokee’s core audience. As before, the Jeep moves quietly over the road with a palpable sense of heft (and it is quite heavy), its suspension absorbing bumps and thumps without sacrificin­g decent body control when cornering. Predictabl­y, you won’t have fun on a twisty road-not with the subpar 0.80 g of cornering grip we measured on our skidpad-but the Cherokee steers accurately and the body doesn’t keel over. The brake pedal moves through a viscous, firm stroke that on a sensory level matches the heavily weighted steering action.

The interior, which carries over unchanged from last year, is functional, attractive­ly styled, and assembled from aboveavera­ge materials (more so in upper trims). Yet the cramped cabin suffers from thick roof pillars, and the high seating position clashes with the fairly low roof. And although Jeep’s advertisem­ents feature the tagline “the world comes with it,” you can’t actually fit that much stuff inside the Cherokee. Per Jeep’s specificat­ions, its notably smaller Compass actually holds five cubic feet more stuff when both vehicles’ rear seats are folded down; behind the rear seatbacks, cargo volume is effectivel­y the same between the two Jeeps. (In our testing, we were able to fit one more carry-onsized case behind the Cherokee’s rear seats versus the Compass; we loaded two extra cases into the Cherokee with the back seats lowered.) Oh, and even though the Cherokee’s body is 10.1 inches longer overall-and rides on a wheelbase that’s 2.8 inches longer than that of the Compass-its cabin volume edges the Compass’s by a mere one cubic foot, and the two SUVs’ leg- and headroom dimensions are right on top of each other.

So, what justifies the Cherokee’s existence alongside the more affordable, better-looking, just-as-roomy Compass in Jeep showrooms? Besides the fact that Jeep can’t sell enough vehicles with its name on them, the Cherokee trades at higher, more profit-friendly prices. An entrylevel, front-wheel-drive Cherokee Latitude starts at $25,440, which is $2900 more than a Compass; the least expensive Cherokee with the V-6 will run you $27,185 (add $1500 for all-wheel drive), including Jeep’s absurd $1445 destinatio­n charge.

It’s just a hop, skip, and a shrug between those Cherokees and the top-dog $39,220 Overland pictured here. Accounting for our test vehicle’s $1295 panoramic sunroof and $995 Technology package (rain-sensing windshield wipers, adaptive cruise control, automated emergency braking, automatic highbeam control, lane-departure warning, an automatic parking system, and blind-spot monitoring), you’re looking at a $41,510 leather-lined compact Jeep crossover. Given the Cherokee’s utterly unexceptio­nal looks and performanc­e, we’d suggest opting for whichever version you can get for about $10,000 less, given the crushing excellence of competitor­s such as the Honda CR-V and the Mazda CX-5, both of which top out under $35,000 with similar equipment.

 ?? JEEP ??
JEEP
 ?? JEEP ??
JEEP

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States