San Francisco Chronicle

Abortion limitation review requested

- By Chevel Johnson Chevel Johnson is an Associated Press writer.

NEW ORLEANS — A group that supports abortion rights wants a federal appeals court to revisit its split decision upholding a Louisiana law that requires abortion providers to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals.

The Center for Reproducti­ve Rights on Friday asked that the full Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rehear the case. A panel of judges on the appellate court, in a split 2-1 decision last month, upheld the law.

The Center said it asked the court to rehear the case because the decision “violates binding Supreme Court precedent.”

“What these two judges did is really outrageous,” said Travis Tu, the Center’s senior counsel. “Any first-year law student knows that when the Supreme Court speaks, lower courts are supposed to listen. And the Supreme Court said that the exact same law in Texas was unconstitu­tional. So how can the Louisiana law be constituti­onal?”

The Fifth Circuit ruling acknowledg­es a U.S. Supreme Court decision striking down an admitting privileges law in Texas — a case known as Whole Woman’s Health. But the majority said Louisiana’s law does not impose the same “substantia­l burden” on women as the Texas law. The ruling reversed a Baton Rouge-based federal judge’s decision in the case and ordered the lawsuit by opponents of the law dismissed.

Opponents have said if the law goes into effect, it could result in the closure of at least two of the three clinics that provide abortions in Louisiana. Louisiana health care providers and the Center are currently challengin­g many of the other restrictio­ns in two other lawsuits

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States