San Francisco Chronicle

Confederat­e statues deemed protected war memorials

- By Liam Stack Liam Stack is a New York Times writer.

A Virginia judge has ruled that local authoritie­s in Charlottes­ville cannot remove two Confederat­e statues because they are war memorials protected by state law, a decision that came nearly two years after a deadly white nationalis­t rally there that was nominally organized to protest a plan to move one of the statues.

The ruling is the latest turn in a long-running battle over the statues of the Confederat­e generals Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson.

Some, including the city of Charlottes­ville, which was sued after the City Council initially voted to remove the Lee statue, see the statues as monuments to racism. But others, including a group of citizens who filed the lawsuit six months before the 2017 rally, argue that they are Civil War memorials.

Judge Richard Moore of Charlottes­ville Circuit Court said in a letter dated April 25 that the statues can be viewed as both monuments to the war and as symbols of racism, but only because both sides in the case agree that they depict Confederat­e military leaders. That inherently makes them war memorials, he wrote.

“While some people obviously see Lee and Jackson as symbols of white supremacy, others see them as brilliant military tacticians or complex leaders in a difficult time,” the judge wrote. He added, “In either event, the statues to them under the undisputed facts of this case still are monuments and memorials to them, as veterans of the Civil War.”

The white nationalis­t rally in August 2017 was organized to oppose a City Council vote to remove the statue of Lee. It resulted in the death of a counterpro­tester, and two state troopers were killed in a helicopter crash as they monitored the event.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States