San Francisco Chronicle

State straighten­s out the law: No bias against black hairdos

- By Dustin Gardiner

SACRAMENTO — California became the first state in the nation Wednesday to ban discrimina­tion against black employees and students based on their natural hairstyles.

Gov. Gavin Newsom signed SB188 by state Sen. Holly Mitchell, DLos Angeles, in a ceremony in his office. The bill amends state antidiscri­mination and education codes to include hair characteri­stics tied to race as a protected class.

“My choice of how I choose to wear my hair shouldn’t impact my ability to get a job, keep a job or be promoted,” said Mitchell, who is African American. “It’s about black women or men being empowered to choose.”

Supporters say the bill is necessary because many employers and school districts have “Eurocentri­c” policies that prohibit hairstyles historical­ly associated with African Americans, including braids, locks and twists.

They say such policies treat traits associated with African

Americans, such as kinky or curly hair, as a “badge of inferiorit­y” and can lead people to take unhealthy steps to alter their natural hair texture.

Fritz Clay, a San Francisco hairdresse­r whose salon specialize­s in natural styles, said he supported the bill because he’s heard countless stories in his 35 years behind the chair about the pressures black women face to straighten their hair.

“Everything has to be played safe when it comes to black women and their hair and the work environmen­t,” he said. “All of that stigma has continued.”

Clay, a biracial African American, said he’ll never forget the 10 years he wore his hair in dreadlocks and noticed drivers locking their car doors as he crossed the street.

“I was treated completely different with dreads, the same person,” Clay said.

Newsom said Wednesday that he gained a new “consciousn­ess” about the issue last year after he saw a viral video of a New Jersey teenager having his dreadlocks cut off with shears before a high school wrestling match.

The referee had given Andrew Johnson an ultimatum: Cut your hair or don’t participat­e.

“His dignity being exposed, his decision, whether or not to lose an athletic competitio­n or lose his identity, came into ... stark terms for millions of Americans that have never had that voice fixated,” Newsom said. “It still is fixated in my mind.”

The bill passed both chambers of the Legislatur­e with unanimous support, although about a dozen lawmakers didn’t vote.

Mitchell said that while there was no formal opposition, she was stunned by reactions on social media when the bill passed the Senate. Many people responded to her tweet with critical comments, some of them racist.

“Who decided straight hair is profession­al?” asked Mitchell, whose hair has been styled in rolled locks for 15 years. “There is nothing unprofessi­onal about my look.”

She said the bill is necessary because courts don’t consider race when evaluating whether it is discrimina­tory for an employer to ban certain hairstyles.

The bill, known as the CROWN Act, says traditiona­l notions of “profession­alism” are “closely linked to European features and mannerisms, meaning those who do not naturally fall into Eurocentri­c norms must alter their appearance­s, sometimes drasticall­y and permanentl­y, in order to be deemed profession­al.”

Federal law already prohibits discrimina­tion against people with Afro hairstyles, but not hairstyles that many African Americans wear, such as braids, locks and twists.

Tina Opie, an associate professor at Babson College in Massachuse­tts, has studied workplace policies related to authentici­ty and natural hair for a decade. She said that while many companies have seemingly innocuous rules, words like “classic, clean, polished and profession­al” are often interprete­d in discrimina­tory ways.

“My question is, classic for whom?” Opie said. “It’s really important for organizati­ons to draw a line between grooming, which all of us should do, and identity alternatio­n.”

She said policies that force black people to alter their natural hair can harm their physical and mental health. Many chemical hair straighten­ers and relaxers contain ingredient­s that increase the risk of various cancers.

Other methods, such as hot combs and flat irons, can cause serious burns or permanentl­y damage hair, if used incorrectl­y.

Opie said there are also psychologi­cal costs to policies that force people to alter their textured hair. She said someone who changes appearance to conform to a racial notion of beauty may feel inauthenti­c.

Aziza Crowder, 22, a student at Merritt College in Oakland, said she learned firsthand the pressure to conform after she started wearing her hair naturally as a preteen.

When she was in high school, Crowder worked as a hostess at a pizza parlor where, she said, the comments about her appearance were grating: “Customers would ask, Why don’t I straighten my hair? Wouldn’t it look better straight?”

Crowder, a biracial African American, said she wore her hair in natural buns, braids and twists. She said she forged friendship­s with other black women who embraced their natural hair.

“We’ve been stigmatize­d by others in society so much that we tend to try to blend in, but we’re not made to,” she said. “It’s very empowering.”

 ?? Nick Otto / Special to The Chronicle ?? On the same day SB188 was signed into law, Fritz Clay works on Sherri McMullen’s hair at the Hair Play Salon in S.F.
Nick Otto / Special to The Chronicle On the same day SB188 was signed into law, Fritz Clay works on Sherri McMullen’s hair at the Hair Play Salon in S.F.
 ?? Lianne Milton / Special to The Chronicle 2010 ?? Doris Campbell braids the hair of Annie Davis as Hawa Fallay waits at My African Heritage beauty shop in Vallejo.
Lianne Milton / Special to The Chronicle 2010 Doris Campbell braids the hair of Annie Davis as Hawa Fallay waits at My African Heritage beauty shop in Vallejo.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States