San Francisco Chronicle

Economy grew by an annual rate of 2.1% in quarter

- By Ben Casselman Ben Casselman is a New York Times writer.

Economic growth slowed last spring, but don’t panic — the decadelong expansion has lost some momentum, but there’s little reason to think it is about to stall out.

Gross domestic product, the broadest measure of goods and services produced in the economy, rose at a 2.1% annual rate in the second quarter, according to preliminar­y data released by the Commerce Department on Friday. That represents a significan­t decelerati­on from the 3.1% growth rate in the first quarter.

But the big swings in the quarterly data are almost certainly exaggerate­d. The larger trend shows that the economy has cooled since last year, when tax cuts and government spending gave growth a temporary jolt. But the strong job market and robust consumer spending are keeping the recovery on track, even as trade tensions and a slowing global economy are threatenin­g to knock it off course.

“It’s a good economy, but it’s got fragilitie­s in it,” said Diane Swonk, chief economist for the accounting firm Grant Thornton. “You’d expect to feel more euphoria and more underlying strength, and instead what we’re seeing is fault lines.”

Growth in the first quarter looked good on the surface, but the underlying details were much weaker. The pattern reversed in the second quarter. Final demand — a measure of underlying growth that strips out some of the most volatile components — actually accelerate­d.

The biggest factor: consumer spending, which accounts for more than twothirds of the U.S. economy. Stock market volatility, a prolonged government shutdown and harsh winter weather all contribute­d to weak spending early in the year. But consumer spending roared back in the spring, rising at a 4.3% rate. Government spending, which picked up in the second quarter after being depressed by the shutdown, also helped lift growth.

Unfortunat­ely, other parts of the economy look much weaker. Business investment declined and exports slumped as manufactur­ers, in particular, were battered by tariffs and slowing demand from overseas. If that continues, it could slow hiring or even lead to layoffs, which would hurt consumer spending as well.

“There’s nothing that I can point to about the consumer and say I’m worried,” said Ellen Zentner, chief U.S. economist for Morgan Stanley. “But how long can business investment remain this sluggish without spilling over into jobs and the consumer?”

The housing market continued its recent struggle. Residentia­l fixed investment, which includes housing constructi­on, declined for the sixth consecutiv­e quarter.

Last year was one of the best years of the recovery — but it wasn’t as good as it appeared initially.

The Commerce Department on Friday revised GDP data back to 2014, an annual process that incorporat­es data not available when earlier estimates were released. One big change in the data: Growth in the middle of 2018 was not quite as strong as it seemed at first.

The change robbed President Trump of a favorite talking point: Before the revisions, growth last year was 3% by one of two commonly used measures. (It fell just short by the other.) Now, by the White House’s preferred method, GDP grew just 2.5% last year.

Trump’s 3% target matters for politics, not economics. But the slower growth last year does have realworld implicatio­ns. It suggests that the economy came into this year in weaker shape than previously believed, and it could help explain why business investment has lagged.

“That’s half a percentage point less momentum in the economy than we thought before,” said Ben Herzon, an economist for Macroecono­mic Advisers, a forecastin­g firm. “We had been expecting Q2 to be the beginning of the downshift, but it looks like it started before.”

The second quarter of this year was the 10th anniversar­y of the end of the Great Recession. Assuming another downturn hasn’t already begun, this is now the longest expansion on record.

There are some signs that the record run could be nearing its end. Some forecastin­g models, particular­ly those based on the market for government bonds, have been flashing warning signs, and surveys show that economists think the risk of a recession in 2020 has been gradually rising.

“Obviously, the headwinds are increasing,” said Joe Brusuelas, chief economist for RSM, a financial consulting firm. Europe is close to a recession or perhaps already in one. A trade deal with China looks to be months away at best. A flareup in the trade war could be enough to cause a recession, he said.

On the other hand, this week’s budget deal between the Trump administra­tion and Congress eased the risk of another government shutdown or a standoff over the debt ceiling. And if the United States and China were to reach a deal this fall, that could give the expansion a new life, Brusuelas said.

“Once that uncertaint­y is off the table, you’ll see a release of demand,” he said.

Friday’s report is one of the last major pieces of economic data before next week’s Federal Reserve Board meeting, when policymake­rs are widely expected to cut interest rates in an effort to stimulate the economy.

The report is unlikely to change the Fed’s mind. But it could affect how policymake­rs think about the need for further cuts later this year — something investors have been anticipati­ng but that Fed officials have yet to commit to.

The strong details in Friday’s report might weaken the case for further cuts. The Fed has been paying particular attention to inflation, which had been running below its 2% target. But inflation picked up in the second quarter: Consumer prices rose at a 2.3% rate, or 1.8% excluding the volatile food and energy components, according to Friday’s GDP report.

 ?? Ben Margot / Associated Press ?? Trucks wait to unload shipping containers at the Port of Oakland. Overseas demand has weakened.
Ben Margot / Associated Press Trucks wait to unload shipping containers at the Port of Oakland. Overseas demand has weakened.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States