San Francisco Chronicle

Police signaled target of raid was journalist

- By Evan Sernoffsky

San Francisco police gave a judge numerous indication­s that a man who obtained a confidenti­al police report on the death of Public Defender Jeff Adachi was a journalist when they applied for a search warrant to unmask his source, court records released Tuesday show.

But the warrant’s affidavit shows that San Francisco Superior Court Judge Victor Hwang neverthele­ss cleared police to raid Bryan Carmody’s office on May 10, despite California’s Shield Law, which protects journalist­s from being compelled to reveal confidenti­al sources and unpublishe­d material like notes and photograph­s. The law applies to freelancer­s and specifical­ly bars police searches.

Sgt. Joseph Obidi wrote in the probable cause statement that Carmody said he “profits finan

cially from every story that he covers,” and that Carmody “makes a career out of producing/selling hot news stories.” Obidi also referenced a memo by the San Francisco public defender’s office that identified Carmody as a “stringer,” which is an industry term for a freelance videograph­er who sells video footage to television news stations.

“This affidavit shows a wholesale failure by the San Francisco political establishm­ent, the Police Department and the judiciary to recognize and protect the constituti­onal rights of Bryan Carmody, and by extension, all journalist­s,” said David Snyder, executive director of the First Amendment Coalition, which fought to have the records released. “The Police Department gave Judge Hwang ample evidence that Carmody is a journalist and that the material they wanted was his confidenti­al sources.”

A spokesman for the courts said Hwang cannot comment beyond what he’s said in court.

The raid on Carmody’s home and office became a national controvers­y over possible First Amendment violations as police scrambled to identify the report’s leaker amid pressure from city officials. Many in City Hall believed the leak was an attempt to smear Adachi, who was an outspoken police critic. The report revealed that Adachi died in a mysterious apartment with a woman who was not his wife.

The warrant signed by Hwang, which police obtained after raiding Carmody’s home with a sledgehamm­er earlier in the day, shows for the first time that police were investigat­ing two officers as the source of the leaked Adachi report. Carmody later sold the report to three television news stations.

Investigat­ors in the department’s Internal Affairs Bureau obtained surveillan­ce video showing an officer enter Central Police Station and then leave half an hour after communicat­ing on the phone with Carmody, according to the affidavit. The officer, Obidi said, was not on assignment and didn’t respond to any calls near the station.

Obidi wrote he believed the officer’s “visit to Central Police Station was for the purpose of accessing the death investigat­ion report.”

Hwang redacted the name of the officer. Chief Bill Scott said he wants to turn over the criminal investigat­ion to an outside agency. But none of the evidence obtained in searches of Carmody’s property can legally be used by any new investigat­ors because the warrants have been quashed. No outside agency has stepped up to take over the investigat­ion.

Scott defended the raid for two weeks, but amid mounting criticism he changed course, apologizin­g and conceding the raid was wrong. He said he did so because he was “concerned by a lack of due diligence by department investigat­ors in seeking search warrants.”

But the affidavit released Tuesday shows that the chief ’s spokesman, David Stevenson, originally told investigat­ors that Carmody sold the report to television stations. Obidi’s attorney said Stevenson never told investigat­ors that Carmody had a department­issued press pass.

The Police Department had asked another judge to redact a portion of the warrant that mentioned the chief ’s involvemen­t in the investigat­ion. The Chronicle last week obtained that redacted paragraph. Hwang did not redact the same passage.

The Chronicle also learned that Scott changed course after City Attorney Dennis Herrera told the chief he could not defend the raid, according to several sources with knowledge of the discussion. The sources spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.

The Police Department did not respond to a request for comment.

In unsealing and quashing the May 10 warrant last week, Hwang joined three other Superior Court judges in conceding that Carmody was a journalist protected by the state’s shield law. Judges Gail Dekreon, Christophe­r Hite, Rochelle East and Hwang all said they were unaware Carmody had a press pass.

Investigat­ors didn’t include that Carmody had a press pass in any of the warrants. In the warrants signed by East and Hite, police only identified him as a “Freelance Videograph­er/Communicat­ions manager, USO Bay Area.” The warrant Dekreon signed, which cleared police to search Carmody’s home, has not yet been released.

First Amendment advocates said that even though the warrant didn’t mention the press pass, the descriptio­ns in the affidavit Hwang signed should have alerted the judge that Carmody was a journalist.

“This really brings full circle the failings at multiple junctures,” Snyder said. “It’s not just one rogue sergeant seeking a warrant that the SFPD wasn’t entitled to. It was multiple gates that this passed through, and San Francisco failed to protect a journalist at all of those gates.”

Carmody’s attorney, Ben Berkowitz, on Tuesday said he was “gratified” the judges quashed the “illegal search warrants.”

“It’s now clear from the unsealed warrant applicatio­ns that the SFPD knew Bryan was a journalist when they sought these illegal warrants,” he said in a statement. “We continue to call on Mayor (London) Breed, the Board of Supervisor­s and Police Chief Scott to make real reforms. It should never be the case that law enforcemen­t intentiona­lly violates the protection­s of the First Amendment and California’s Shield Law to spy on a journalist.”

“The material they wanted was his confidenti­al sources.” David Snyder, First Amendment Coalition executive director

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States