San Francisco Chronicle

Justice Department seeks to weaken judicial union

- By Christina Goldbaum Christina Goldbaum is a New York Times writer.

The Justice Department has moved to decertify the union of immigratio­n judges, a maneuver that could muffle an organizati­on whose members have sometimes been openly critical of the Trump administra­tion’s immigratio­n enforcemen­t agenda.

The department filed a petition Friday asking the Federal Labor Relations Authority to determine whether the union, the National Associatio­n of Immigratio­n Judges, should have its certificat­ion revoked because its members are considered “management officials” ineligible to collective­ly organize, according to a Justice Department spokesman.

The move suggested escalating tensions between overwhelme­d immigratio­n judges desperate for greater resources and a Justice Department pushing them to quickly address a backlog of immigratio­n cases.

“This is a misguided effort to minimize our impact,” said Judge Amiena Khan, vice president of the judges union, which has publicly criticized the use of a quota system in immigratio­n court and other attempts to speed up proceeding­s.

“We serve as a check and balance on management prerogativ­es, and that’s why they are doing this to us,” Khan said.

Unlike other federal judges who are part of the judicial branch, immigratio­n judges are appointed by the attorney general and are employees of the Justice Department. Although sitting judges are prohibited from speaking publicly about issues that could be considered political, representa­tives of the immigratio­n judges union can speak publicly about Justice Department policies on behalf of its members.

This is not the first time an administra­tion has challenged the organizati­on. The Clinton administra­tion also tried to decertify the immigratio­n judges union, a move that the Federal Labor Relations Authority rejected, according to former immigratio­n judges.

Both Khan and the union president, Judge Ashley Tabaddor, have spoken out repeatedly against what they say is an attempt to turn immigratio­n judges from neutral arbiters of the law to law enforcemen­t agents enacting the White House’s policies. They have called for immigratio­n judges to be independen­t of the Justice Department.

The judges union plans to officially respond to the Justice Department’s petition once it receives official notificati­on from the Federal Labor Relations Authority.

If the attempt to decertify the union is successful, it could leave judges without recourse for their already overwhelmi­ng workload, judges said.

“The union won’t be able to help judges with overall working conditions at a time when most all judges would tell you working conditions are worse now than they have ever been,” said Paul Schmidt, a former immigratio­n judge.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States