Effort seeks to stop tech tax shifting
Digital tax dodgers, take heed: International leaders have advanced a plan to prevent large multinational companies like Apple, Facebook and Amazon from avoiding taxes by shifting profits between countries.
It’s an effort to deescalate a global battle over how to tax the digital economy.
The framework proposal, released last week by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, would allow countries to tax large multinationals even if they do not operate inside their borders. If international negotiators can now reach agreement on its key details, the plan will pave the way for new taxes not just on tech companies but on automakers and any other large multinational firms that operate online.
Political and corporate leaders have clashed in recent years over how — and where — to tax companies that operate across national borders, particularly those that sell goods and services online.
Traditionally, companies have paid taxes in the countries where their economic activity is generated. But in the digital economy, firms can “move” the source of their profits, like patents and other intellectual property, to countries where tax rates are extremely low. That allows them to pay lower rates than companies that operate only in a single country like the United States.
Many countries, particularly those in Europe, have moved to curb that practice by approving new taxes on large multinational companies that sell to their citizens but pay little or no tax to their countries. France approved a new digital tax this year that would hit large U.S. tech companies like Google. The Trump administration responded by threatening tariffs on imported French goods, like wine, before the countries agreed to pause their plans in hopes of finding a multilateral agreement through the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
The new proposal is an 18page framework plan that officials hope will form the basis of an international agreement on digital taxation by next year. That framework would fundamentally alter how and where companies that operate across national borders are taxed, though it leaves the details of those tax rates to future negotiators. It suggests new rules on where companies should pay taxes — largely based on where their sales occur — and which profits are subject to taxation.
“In a digital age, the allocation of taxing rights can no longer be exclusively circumscribed by reference to physical presence,” the framework states. “The current rules dating back to the 1920s are no longer sufficient to ensure a fair allocation of taxing rights in an increasingly globalized world.”
The framework applies only to multinationals with annual revenue of about $825 million or higher. It excludes manufacturing suppliers and resource extraction companies, like oil companies.
As it stands, the framework appears to be a victory for large, consumptionheavy countries like the United States, China and much of Western Europe, and a loss for those nations known as tax havens, like Ireland. Advancing the negotiating process is a win for large multinationals, even though a final deal could put them on the hook to pay more in taxes, because the alternative appears to be a series of countrybycountry digital taxes that could be expensive to comply with.
“Amazon welcomes the publication of these proposals by the (economic development organization), which are an important step forward,” a spokeswoman said in an email. “Reaching broad international agreement on changes to fundamental international tax principles is critical to limit the risk of double taxation and distortive unilateral measures and to provide an environment that fosters growth in global trade, which is vital for the millions of customers and sellers that Amazon supports around the globe.”
A Treasury Department spokesman said Wednesday that the United States “is studying the ... proposal and is actively engaged in the process aimed at forging a consensus on international tax issues” before reiterating the administration’s opposition “to unilateral digital services taxes.”
The framework will be taken up for discussion by finance ministers from large countries, who are due to meet in Washington this week. Jim Tankersley is a New York Times writer.