San Francisco Chronicle

Trump aide admits to quid pro quo

- By Molly O’Toole, Jennifer Haberkorn and Sarah D. Wire Molly O’Toole, Jennifer Haberkorn and Sarah D. Wire are Los Angeles Times writers.

WASHINGTON — President Trump withheld roughly $400 million in aid to Ukraine earlier this year in part to push its new government to investigat­e Democrats, acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney said Thursday, a stunning confirmati­on that hits directly at the center of House Democrats’ impeachmen­t inquiry.

It marked the first time a senior White House official has directly linked the decision to delay the aid to Trump’s demand for Ukraine to investigat­e what, if any, role the country played in the 2016 U.S. investigat­ion.

There has been no evidence that Ukraine interfered in the election, but Trump and his supporters suspect Ukraine is somehow linked to a Democratic National Committee server and the emails stolen by Russia that proved embarrassi­ng to Hillary Clinton.

“Did he also mention to me in the past the corruption related to the DNC server?” Mulvaney said. “Absolutely. No question about that. But that’s it, and that’s why we held up the money. The look back to what was happening in 2016 was part of that thing.”

But Mulvaney insisted in a defiant briefing that there was nothing wrong with Trump’s actions, saying politics is always part of foreign policy:

“I have news for everybody: Get over it. There’s going to be political influence in foreign policy. That is going to happen. Elections have consequenc­es.”

In a July 25 phone call, Trump asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for a “favor”: to help investigat­e the Democrats’ 2016 server as well as the business activities of his potential 2020 rival, former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter. There is no evidence of any wrongdoing by the Bidens.

Trump had previously acknowledg­ed making the request on the phone call. But he had always insisted that the delay in the aid was a separate issue, triggered by his desire to push Ukraine to fight domestic corruption and because he wanted European nations to contribute more aid to Ukraine.

Mulvaney said those were also factors in Trump’s decision. But his statements are certain to give fuel to the impeachmen­t inquiry of Democrats, who have characteri­zed the phone call as a quid pro quo and abuse of presidenti­al power.

Within hours, Mulvaney issued a separate statement claiming his remarks were misconstru­ed, the Associated Press reported.

“Let me be clear, there was absolutely no quid pro quo between Ukrainian military aid and any investigat­ion into the 2016 election,” he said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States