San Francisco Chronicle

Thousands of absentee ballot applicatio­ns denied

- By Julie Carr Smyth Julie Carr Smyth is an Associated Press writer.

COLUMBUS, Ohio — Thousands of Ohio voters were held up or stymied in their efforts to get absentee ballots for last year’s general election because of missing or mismatched signatures on their ballot applicatio­ns, an Associated Press review has found.

The signature requiremen­t on such applicatio­ns is a largely overlooked and spottily tracked step in Ohio’s voting process, which has shifted increasing­ly to mailin ballots since early, nofault absentee voting was instituted in 2005.

To supporters, the requiremen­t is a useful form of protection against voter fraud and provides an extra layer of security necessary for absentee balloting.

To detractors, it’s a recipe for disenfranc­hisement — a cumbersome addition to an already stringent voter identifica­tion system.

Susan Barnard, of Dayton in Montgomery County, said her 78yearold husband, Leslie, who has cancer, missed a chance to vote last year because of a delay related to the signature requiremen­t.

“We had planned a cruise last fall to give him something to look forward to,” said Barnard, 73. “It fell at the time of the election, and we were going to vote the absentee ballot. We got right down to the wire and we didn’t have one for him, and so he did not vote because of that.”

She said he had hoped to vote in the election, which included races for governor, state Supreme Court and Congress. Barnard suspects her husband simply forgot to sign his ballot applicatio­n.

Figures provided through public informatio­n requests to Ohio’s 88 county boards of elections show 21 counties rejected more than 6,500 absentee ballot applicatio­ns because a signature was either missing or didn’t match what was on file. That requiremen­t is not for the ballot itself, which faces a different battery of requiremen­ts, but merely for an applicatio­n requesting one. Another five counties reported rejecting about 850 applicatio­ns combined, for various reasons that the boards didn’t specify.

The few counties that tracked what happened to applicatio­ns after they were rejected said issues were largely addressed before or on Election Day.

Twelve responding counties recorded encounteri­ng no signature issues with the absentee applicatio­ns. The remaining responding counties said they didn’t track how many applicatio­ns they rejected.

It’s a statistic conspicuou­sly absent from all the official data collected by the state, making it all but impossible to compare the issue across years or multiple states.

Signatures and other verificati­on requiremen­ts are there to safeguard Ohio’s elections, said state Rep. John Becker, a southweste­rn Ohio Republican. He said if a voter fails to sign the applicatio­n form, “that’s on them.”

But Jen Miller, executive director of the League of Women Voters of Ohio, said the AP analysis highlights a largely unexamined step in a process her organizati­on already views as inefficien­t and subject to uneven enforcemen­t.

“So a person can register to vote online, but if you go online to request an absentee ballot, a form is mailed to you that you have to mail back,” Miller said. Her organizati­on supports allowing people to request absentee ballots online.

About 1.4 million of Ohio’s roughly 8 million registered voters cast absentee ballots last year.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States